Allowed¶2

Niharika Rohit Dimble v. Rohit Narayan Dimble

Bombay HC2 Dec 2025MCA/422/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Transfer petition allowed: P.A. No. 2460 of 2025 moved from Family Court, Pune to Civil Judge Senior Division, Kalyan within four weeks; hearing expedited; respondent-husband (Rohit Narayan Dimble) permitted to appear via video conferencing subject to in-person attendance on direction. Applicant: Niharika Rohit Dimble. Bench: Rajesh S. Patil, J. Decided 11 December 2025; MCA No. 422/2025; Bombay High Court.

What did the court decide?

Transfer of P.A. No. 2460 of 2025 from the Family Court, Pune to the Civil Judge Senior Division, Kalyan within four weeks; hearing of the proceeding expedited; respondent-husband permitted to attend the proceedings through video conferencing, with in-person attendance required whenever directed by the learned Judge. ¶2

Niharika Rohit Dimble vs Rohit Narayan Dimble — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶2

Issue for consideration

Whether the proceedings of P.A. No. 2460 of 2025 pending before the Family Court at Pune should be transferred to the Civil Judge Senior Division, Kalyan (prayer clause (b) of the Misc. Civil Application). +1 more

¶3

Court's answer

The Misc. Civil Application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (b).

¶2

Ratio / Principle

The proceedings of P.A. No. 2460 of 2025 pending before the Family Court at Pune shall be transferred within a period of four weeks to the Civil Judge Senior Division, Kalyan.

¶3

Key takeaways

The hearing of the said proceeding is expedited.ratio¶4
The respondent-husband is permitted to attend the Court proceedings before the Civil Judge Senior Division, Kalyan, through video conferencing.ratio¶5
Whenever necessary, as per the directions of the learned Judge taking up the matter, the respondent-husband will have to attend the proceedings in person despite the video-conferencing permission.ratio

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Civil Appellate Jurisdiction (Rajesh S. Patil, J.), Misc. Civil Application No. 422/2025, decided 11 December 2025. After the respondent-husband, on instructions conveyed through his counsel, stated that he had no objection to the application being allowed, the Court allowed the Misc. Civil Application in terms of prayer clause (b). The proceedings of P.A. No. 2460 of 2025 pending before the Family Court at Pune were ordered to be transferred to the Civil Judge Senior Division, Kalyan within four weeks, and the hearing of the transferred proceeding was expedited. The respondent-husband was permitted to attend the Court proceedings before the Civil Judge Senior Division, Kalyan through video conferencing; however, whenever necessary, as per the directions of the learned Judge taking up the matter, he will have to attend the proceedings in person.

Niharika Rohit Dimble v. Rohit Narayan Dimble

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Niharika Rohit Dimble v. Rohit Narayan Dimble

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Ananta Dhondiba Sane vs the Land Acquisition Officer NO.17 Pune

Roshani Sameer Papal vs Sameer Dinkar Papal

Sonu Sukhram Prajapati vs Sukhram Jagdish Prajapati

Bhiwandi Nizampur Municipal Council Vs Smt. Fatima Abdul Khalique and Anr.

Diana Suyash Dethe Nee Diana Paulas Ahire vs Suyash Shailendra Dethe

Vidya Amol Kasar vs Amol Bhausaheb Kasar