Disposed¶32

Smt. Sushma Shrinivas Manthalkar v. Shrinivas Chandrakant Manthalkar

Bombay HC4 Sept 2025MCA/359/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

MCA 359 of 2025, Bombay High Court, Rajesh S. Patil, J., order dated 21 November 2025, Sushma Shrinivas Manthalkar v. Shrinivas Chandrakant Manthalkar. Procedural order: affidavit of service not filed; private service on respondent not effected; copy sent by private notice returned 'unclaimed'; earlier orders dated 19 September 2025 (notice, private service permitted, ad-interim relief) and 8 October 2025 (returnable date extended to 20 November 2025; copy to Registry within one week on pain of dismissal). Matter stood over to 5 December 2025; ad-interim relief granted earlier vacated. No statutes or precedents discussed; no monetary relief.

What did the court decide?

The ad-interim relief granted earlier stands vacated. ¶32

Smt. Sushma Shrinivas Manthalkar vs Shrinivas Chandrakant Manthalkar — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

KVM

¶2

1/2

¶3

27 - MCA 359 OF 2025.doc

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶5

Digitally signed KANCHAN by KANCHANVINOD VINOD MAYEKAR MAYEKAR Date:2025.11.25 11:02:49 +0530

¶6

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶7

MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 359 OF 2025

¶8

SUSHMA SHRINIVAS MANTHALKAR

¶9

….. APPLICANT

¶10

VERSUS

¶11

SHRINIVAS CHANDRAKANT MANTHALKAR ….. RESPONDENT

¶12

Adv. Vikas Somawanshi i/b. Adv. Dhananjay Bhosale for the Applicant.

¶13

CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

¶14

DATE : 21 NOVEMBER, 2025

¶15

P.C. :-

¶16

Mr.Somawanshi, learned advocate holding for advocate Mr.Dhananjay Bhosale appears in the present proceeding. Office remark shows that the advocate appearing for the applicant has not bothered to file affidavit of service.

¶17

On 8 October, 2025, following order was passed in the

¶18

present proceeding :-

¶19

Though by an order dated 19 September, 2025, notice was issued to the respondent and the applicant was also permitted to serve the respondent by private service, however, the advocate for the applicant has not bothered to serve the respondent by private service and has not supplied copies to the Registry in order to effect service on the respondent.

¶20

Ad-interim relief was granted by an order dated 19 September, 2025.

¶21

KVM

¶22

2/2

¶23

27 - MCA 359 OF 2025.doc

¶24

1. The returnable date is extended to 20 November,

¶25

¶26

Learned advocate for the applicant to supply copy of the Miscellaneous Civil Application to the Registry within one week. It is made clear that if the copy is not supplied to the Registry within stipulated period, the present Miscellaneous Civil Application to stand dismissed without further reference to Court.

¶27

Ad-interim relief granted earlier, if any, to continue till the next date of the hearing.

¶28

At this stage, Mr.Somawanshi submits that on checking his file, it appears to him that the advocate for the applicant has sent a copy of the present Miscellaneous Civil Application by private notice to the respondent and the same has returned back with remark ‘unclaimed’. However, the advocate for the applicant was not able to

¶29

file affidavit of service. He submits that Mr.Bhosale told him a harsh

¶30

order was passed by this Court.

¶31

1. Stand over to 5 December, 2025.

¶32

1. Ad-interim relief granted earlier stands vacated.

¶33

[RAJESH S. PATIL, J.]

Smt. Sushma Shrinivas Manthalkar v. Shrinivas Chandrakant Manthalkar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Sushma Shrinivas Manthalkar v. Shrinivas Chandrakant Manthalkar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Mahesh Shantaram Dalvi vs Mr. Deepak v. Parekh and Anr.

Industrial Trading Agency and Ors. vs Krishnakumar Girdharilal Gupta

Shri. Prabat Vira Parmar - Dead Thr His LR.1)SHRI.DEVRAJ Parbat Parmar-Dead Thr His Lrs 1.1 to 1.3 vs the State of Maharashtra through the Special Land Acquisition Officer and Anr.

Fibwave Analytical Thr Its Authorized Signatory, Mr. Cyrus Percy Hormusji vs Nikhil Kumar Goel

Mayur Madhusudan Pise vs Radhika Mayur Pise

Vidya Ganesh Narkar vs Ganesh Suryakant Narkar