Allowed¶18

Sau. Pooja W/O Raju Chandekar v. Raju S/O Vasantrao Chandekar

Bombay HC24 Apr 2025MCA/294/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bombay HC Nagpur Bench, MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (Tr.) No. 294 of 2025, decided 11/07/2025 by Mrs. Vrushali V. Joshi, J. Sau. Pooja W/o. Raju Chandekar (applicant; counsel M. R. Deshpande) v. Raju S/o. Vasantrao Chandekar (non-applicant; counsel P. P. Deshmukh). Application to transfer R.C.S. No. 25/2024 from Civil Judge, Junior Division, Arni (Yavatmal) to Family Court, Akola ALLOWED; basis: applicant residing at Akola with pending Section 125 CrPC maintenance proceedings before Family Court, Akola; transfer held to cause no prejudice to non-applicant; mediation at Nagpur declined by applicant.

What did the court decide?

Transfer of R.C.S. No. 25/2024 from the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Arni (Yavatmal) to the Family Court, Akola. ¶18

Sau. Pooja W/O Raju Chandekar vs Raju S/O Vasantrao… — Maintenance and Alimony | Bombay HC (2025)

¶1

54- MCA No. 294-2025.odt

¶2

1/2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

¶4

MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (Tr.)NO. 294 OF 2025

¶5

Sau. Pooja W/o. Raju Chandekar

¶6

Vs.

¶7

Raju S/o. Vasantrao Chandekar

¶8

Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders. or directions and Registrar's orders.

¶9

------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mr. M. R. Deshpande, counsel for the applicant. Mr. P. P. Deshmukh, counsel for the non-applicant.

¶10

CORAM : MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J. DATE : 11/07/2025.

¶11

The applicant has filed this application to transfer R.C.S. No. 25/2024, which is pending before the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Arni (Yavatmal) to Family Court, Akola.

¶12

It is mentioned in the application that the applicant is staying at Akola. She has filed proceedings under Section 125 of Code of Criminal Procedure for maintenance before the Family Court, Akola and she is appearing in said matter. Thus, the applicant has prayed to transfer the matter which is pending before Civil Judge, Junior Division, Arni (Yavatmal) to Family Court, Akola.

¶13

The learned counsel for non-applicant has stated that the non-applicant would like to settle the matter and requests for referring the matter for mediation at Nagpur. The applicant has refused to attend the mediation at Nagpur, as it is difficult for her to attend the mediation proceeding at Nagpur.

¶14

Tanmay

¶15

54- MCA No. 294-2025.odt

¶16

2/2

¶17

As the applicant has filed the proceedings under Section 125 for maintenance and is pending before the Family Court, Akola, the non-applicant has to attend the said proceedings at Akola. As such, if the matter which is pending before the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Arni (Yavatmal) is transferred to Family Court, Akola and the counseling would be done there, it will cause no prejudice to the non-applicant.

¶18

Hence, the Misc. Application is allowed. The matter which is pending before the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Arni (Yavatmal) is transferred to Family Court, Akola.

¶19

(MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.)

¶20

Tanmay

Sau. Pooja W/O Raju Chandekar v. Raju S/O Vasantrao Chandekar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sau. Pooja W/O Raju Chandekar v. Raju S/O Vasantrao Chandekar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Vinay Radheshyam Bhattad vs State of Maharashtra

Vidhaya Manohar Kumbharkar 2 Others vs Ashwini Tushar Bhilkar.

Vishal Tanaji Chavan vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Manohar Lahanuji Rajurkar and Others vs Rajendra Bhaurao Lokhande and Other

Dattatray Dadu Patil vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Dnyandev Narayan Landage and Ors. vs Suryakant Purushottam Khutale and Ors.