Saadiya Rafiq Yakub Shaikh v. Rafiq Yakub Shaikh
Case brief
What is this about?
Paucity adjournment order; Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench; single judge S. G. Chapalgaonkar; dated 16-07-2025; batch adjournment of writ petitions (e.g., WP 10174/2023, WP 10585/2023, WP 10770/2023, WP 866/2025, WP 2617/2025, WP 2799-2829/2025, WP 4593/2025, WP 5002/2025, WP 5137/2025, WP 6457/2025, WP 6918/2025, WP 6215/2013, WP 14723/2023, WP 15389/2023, WP 9083/2013, WP 9721/2013, WP 2917/2023), civil applications, miscellaneous civil applications and contempt petitions (Cont. Petn 745/2017, 299/2024, 58/2025, 375/2025); next dates 08-08-2025, 11-08-2025, 12-08-2025, 03-09-2025, 04-09-2025, 08-09-2025, 09-09-2025, 10-09-2025; interim relief/undertakings/statements continued till next date; AGP P D Patil for respondent State. Interlocutory/administrative order only — not citable for any proposition of law.
What did the court decide?
Purely administrative adjournment: the listed batch of matters adjourned due to paucity of time to the dates and categories shown (8.8.2025, 11.8.2025, 12.8.2025, 3.9.2025, 4.9.2025, 8.9.2025, 9.9.2025, 10.09.2025); no fresh interim relief granted, but any subsisting interim relief/undertaking/statement ordered to continue till the next date.