Disposed¶33

Pr Commissioner of Income Tax Central 4 v. Excel Press Pvt. Ltd.

Bombay HC16 Jul 2025ITXA/973/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax Central - 4 (appellant/Revenue) v. Excel Press Pvt Ltd (respondent/assessee); Bombay High Court, OOCJ; Income Tax Appeal No. 973 of 2024; decided 23 July 2025; Coram B. P. Colabawalla & Firdosh P. Pooniwalla, JJ. Tax effect below Rs.2 crores monetary limit of CBDT Circular No.09 of 2024 dated 17.09.2024; monetary limits apply to pending appeals; CBDT circular exceptions prospective only; exception of Circular dated 15.03.2024 post-dated the filing on 19.09.2022; appeal disposed of, no costs, questions of law kept open; Premier Industrial Corporation (2025) 172 Taxmann.com 289 (Bom) followed.

What did the court decide?

None; the Appeal is disposed of as its tax effect is below the monetary limit, with no order as to costs. ¶33

Pr Commissioner of Income Tax Central 4 vs Excel Press Pvt. Ltd. — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

83.itxa.973.24.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 973 OF 2024

¶3

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax Central - 4

.. Appellant

Versus

Excel Press Pvt Ltd

.. Respondent

Mr. Suresh Kumar, Advocates for the Appellant.

¶9

Ms. Mrunal Parekh (through VC) i/b DMD Advocates, Advocates for the Respondent.

¶10

Digitally signed ANJALI by ANJALITUSHAR TUSHAR ASWALE Date: ASWALE 2025.07.28 12:13:22 +0530

¶11

CORAM: B. P. COLABAWALLA &

¶12

FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ. DATE: JULY 23, 2025

¶13

P. C.

¶14

The above Appeal has been placed on board “for directions” today because we have found that the tax effect in this Appeal is less than Rs.2 Crores as stated in the CBDT Circular No.09 of 2024 dated 17^th September 2024.

¶15

Mr. Suresh Kumar, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Revenue submitted that the present Appeal was filed on 19^th September, 2022 He submitted that when this Appeal was filed, the monetary limit was

¶16

Page 1 of 4 JULY 23, 2025

¶17

Aswale

¶18

83.itxa.973.24.doc

¶19

only Rs.1 Crore and the amount involved in this Appeal is more than Rs. 1 Crore. Accordingly, he submitted that there was no infirmity in filing or prosecuting this Appeal.

¶20

Mr. Suresh Kumar, further submitted that the exceptions for not filing or prosecuting Appeals below the monetary limits was introduced by CBDT Circulars and letters issued from time to time. He referred to Circular dated 15^th March 2024 and submitted that the present Appeal would fall within one of the excepted categories mentioned in the said Circular. Consequently, he submitted that the above Appeal can be entertained notwithstanding that it is below the monetary limit as set out in the CBDT Circular dated 17^th September 2024.

¶21

We have considered the Revenue’s contentions. The precedent on this subject/contention of the Revenue, is set out in the case of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax v/s Premier Industrial Corporation Ltd [(2025) 172 Taxmann.com 289 (Bom)]. Paragraphs 7 and 8 of this decision read thus:-

¶22

Page 2 of 4 JULY 23, 2025

¶23

Aswale

¶24

83.itxa.973.24.doc

¶25

“7. The CIT v. V. M. Salgaonkar and Brothers (P) Ltd. [2024] 169 taxmann.com 597 (Bombay), our orders dated 05 February 2025 in Income Tax Appeal No. 643 of 2018 concerning Pr. CIT v. IPL Loan Trust [2025] 171 taxmann.com 725 and connected matters and order dated 12 February 2025 in Income Tax Appeal No.1998 of 2018 (Pr. CIT v. Axis AD Print Media (India) Ltd. ) and connected appeals hold that the monetary limits prescribed in CBDT circulars would apply to pending appeals. Still, the exceptions carved out by the CBDT circulars would apply only prospectively i.e. from the date of the introduction of such exception.

¶26

8. Admittedly, before 20 August 2018, these appeals were not covered by any exceptions. However, these appeals were filed because they were beyond the monetary limits prescribe then. The monetary limits have now been revised. These revised monetary limits would also apply to the pending appeals as held in the above precedents. By applying the revised monetary limits to the pending appeals and noting that the exception upon which the Revenue relies was unavailable before 20 August 2018, we uphold the objection on behalf of the assessee and dispose of these two appeals without any cost orders”.

¶27

(emphasis supplied)

¶28

As can be seen from this reproduction, this Court has time and again held that the monetary limits prescribed in the CBDT Circulars will apply to pending Appeals as well. In other words, for the purposes of the monetary limits, the Circular dated 17^th September 2024 would apply to the present Appeal. However, this Court has held time and again that the exceptions carved out by the CBDT Circulars would apply only prospectively and would have no application, if they were introduced after the filing of the Appeal. Admittedly, in the present case, the Appeal was filed on 19^th September, 2022, while the exception the Revenue relies upon was introduced vide Circular dated 15^th March 2024. Hence, the exception relied

¶29

Page 3 of 4 JULY 23, 2025

¶30

Aswale

¶31

83.itxa.973.24.doc

¶32

upon by the Revenue in the Circular dated 15^th March 2024 cannot be a justification for prosecuting the above Appeal that was filed on 19^th September, 2022

¶33

In light of the aforesaid discussion, this Appeal is accordingly disposed of because the tax effect is below the monetary limits as set out in the CBDT Circular dated 17^th September 2024. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

¶34

We however, make it clear that the questions of law as projected by the Revenue in the above Appeal are kept open to be considered in an appropriate case.

¶35

This order will be digitally signed by the Private Secretary/ Personal Assistant of this Court. All concerned will act on production by fax or email of a digitally signed copy of this order.

¶36

[FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.] [B. P. COLABAWALLA, J.]

¶37

Page 4 of 4 JULY 23, 2025

¶38

Aswale

Pr Commissioner of Income Tax Central 4 v. Excel Press Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pr Commissioner of Income Tax Central 4 v. Excel Press Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Nirmala MADAN-2013-14 vs Income Tax Officer Int Tax WARD-3(2)(1)- Mumbai

Nirmala MADAN-2016-17 vs Income Tax Officer Int Tax WARD-3(2)(1)-MUMBAI

Nirmala Madan (2019 2020) vs Income Tax Officer Int Tax Ward 3(2)(1) Mumbai

Tata Aig General Insurance Company Limited (2017 18) vs Assistant Commissioner of Income tax Central Circle 6(2), Mumbai

Jp Morgan Services India Pvt. Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner Income tax Circle 2(2)(1), Mumbai

Icici Securities Primary Dealership Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner Income tax Circle 4(1)(1) Mumbai