Disposed¶39

Padmavati Developers v. the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 1 (1) Pune

Bombay HC7 Mar 2025ITXA/466/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of income tax appeals; Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas (DTVSV) Scheme, 2024; Form-2 under the Scheme; leave to withdraw granted; appeals disposed of as withdrawn; Bombay High Court OOCJ; appellants Manoj S. Mehta, Mangalsingh M. Rathod, Kasturi Rashi Developers, Padmavati Developers, Padmavati Developers Empire Estate CTS No.4510/1; respondents ITO WARD-27(2)(2), ACIT -25(2), ITO Ward5(3) Pune, DCIT Circle 1(1) Pune; coram M.S. Sonak and Jitendra Jain, JJ.; dated 07 March 2025; advocates Manohar Samal, Akhileshwar Sharma, Smit Shah, Shashwat Rai.

What did the court decide?

Leave to withdraw the appeals granted; appeals disposed of as withdrawn. ¶39

Padmavati Developers vs the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 1 (1) Pune — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

902-910-ITXA-2197-19+.DOCX

¶2

Sayali

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶4

SAYALI DEEPAK UPASANI

¶5

Digitally signed by SAYALI DEEPAK UPASANI Date: 2025.03.10 10:49:47 +0530

¶6

INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2197 OF 2019

¶7

Manoj S. Mehta …APPELLANT Versus Income Tax Officer WARD-27(2)(2) …RESPONDENT

¶8

AND INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1255 OF 2021

¶9

Mangalsingh M. Rathod …APPELLANT Versus Assistant Commissioner of INCOME TAX -25(2) …RESPONDENT AND INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 2100 OF 2022 Kasturi Rashi Developers …APPELLANT Versus The Income Tax Officer Ward5(3) Pune …RESPONDENT

¶10

AND INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 465 OF 2025

¶11

Padmavati Developers …APPELLANT Versus The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 1(1), Pune …RESPONDENT

¶12

Page 1 of 3

¶13

902-910-ITXA-2197-19+.DOCX

¶14

AND

¶15

INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 466 OF 2025

¶16

Padmavati Developers …APPELLANT Versus The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 1(1), Pune …RESPONDENT

¶17

AND

¶18

INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 467 OF 2025

¶19

Padmavati Developers Empire Estate CTS No.4510/1 …APPELLANT Versus The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 1(1), Pune …RESPONDENT

¶20

AND

¶21

INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 468 OF 2025

¶22

Padmavati Developers …APPELLANT Versus The Deputy Commissioner of Income TAX CIRCLE 1(1), PUNE …RESPONDENT

¶23

AND

¶24

INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 470 OF 2025

¶25

Padmavati Developers …APPELLANT Versus The Deputy Commissioner of Income TAX CIRCLE 1(1), PUNE …RESPONDENT

¶26

AND

¶27

INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 471 OF 2025

¶28

Padmavati Developers …APPELLANT Versus The Deputy Commissioner of Income TAX CIRCLE 1(1), PUNE …RESPONDENT

¶29

Page 2 of 3

¶30

902-910-ITXA-2197-19+.DOCX

¶31

Mr Manohar Samal i/b Ratan Samal, for Appellant in ITXA Nos. /2197/2019 and 1255/2021.

¶32

Mr. Akhileshwar Sharma, for Respondent in ITXA Nos. /2197/2019 and 1255/2021.

¶33

Mr. Smit Shah i/b F. Khambatta, for Appellant in ITXA/2100/2022

¶34

Mr. Shashwat Rai i/b Keystone Partners for Appellants in ITXA Nos.465/2025, 466/2025, 467/2025, 468/2025, 470/2025, 471/2025.

¶35

CORAM: M.S. Sonak & Jitendra Jain, JJ. DATED: 07 MARCH 2025

¶36

PC:-

¶37

Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

¶38

The learned Counsel for the Appellants in each of these Appeals, on instructions, seek leave to withdraw these Appeals. They point out that the Appellants have applied for the benefits under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas (DTVSV) Scheme, 2024. Some of the learned Counsel placed on record the requisite Form-2 under the Scheme.

¶39

Accordingly, we grant leave and dispose of these Appeals as withdrawn.

¶40

(Jitendra Jain, J)

¶41

(M.S. Sonak, J)

¶42

Page 3 of 3

Padmavati Developers v. the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 1 (1) Pune

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Padmavati Developers v. the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 1 (1) Pune

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited - Ay 2019-20 vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax. Tds Circle 2-3 Mumbai

Dinesh Agarwal vs Bureau of Immigration Ministry of Home Affairs

Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited - Ay 2015-16 vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax. Tds Circle 2-3 Mumbai

Unity Group vs Link Palace Chs Ltd.

Sarita Venkat Anthati vs Income Tax officer Ward 42 3 3 Mumbai

Pandharinath Vasant Dhamdhere vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Government Pleader and Ors.