Jayesh Sanghrajka, Resolution Professional For Nirmal Lifestyle Realty Pvt. Ltd. vs The Central Board of Trustees, Employees Provident Fund Organisation — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

Jayesh Sanghrajka, Resolution Professional For Nirmal Lifestyle Realty Pvt. Ltd. vs The Central Board of Trustees, Employees Provident Fund Organisation — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Directions to the City Survey Officer to act on a server copy of the order downloaded from the High Court website and vacate/lift/remove the attachment on the private Respondent's property without delay; Interim Application No.9308 of 2025 and Writ Petition No.13448 of 2017 both disposed.

Issue for consideration

Whether, upon compliance of the order dated 13.08.2025 and receipt of Rs.7,49,48,021/- by the Petitioner, the Court should direct the City Survey Office, Mulund to immediately vacate/lift the attachment on the private Respondent's property made pursuant to orders dated 29.06.2000, 21.07.2011 and 26.03.2012, and delete any adverse entries in the revenue record/property card. +1 more

Court's answer

The order dated 13.08.2025 stands fully complied with; the Petitioner (Central Board of Trustees, EPFO) received Rs.7,49,48,021/- from the Respondent.

Ratio / Principle

The Court noted the Petitioner's statement that it has lifted the attachment from its record of the Respondent's property and that the attachment no longer subsists.

Key takeaways

The Court directed the City Survey Officer to act on a server copy of the order downloaded from the High Court website and to ensure there is no delay in vacating/lifting/removing the attachment on the private property of the Respondent.ratio¶22
In view of the compliance and the directions issued, the Interim Application and the Writ Petition were both disposed of.ratio¶24

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Bombay High Court (Milind N. Jadhav, J.) disposed of Interim Application No.9308 of 2025 in Writ Petition No.13448 of 2017 after recording that the order dated 13.08.2025 stood fully complied with — the Central Board of Trustees, Employees Provident Fund Organisation confirming receipt of Rs.7,49,48,021/- from the Respondent — and that the Petitioner had lifted the attachment from its record of the Respondent's property, which therefore no longer subsists. The Court directed the City Survey Officer, Mulund to act on a server copy of the order downloaded from the High Court website and to ensure, without any delay, removal of the attachment on the private Respondent's property imposed pursuant to orders dated 29.06.2000, 21.07.2011 and 26.03.2012.

11.IA.9308.2025.doc

HARSHADA H. SAWANT (P.A.)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

INTERIM APPLICATION NO.9308 OF 2025 IN

WRIT PETITION NO.13448 OF 2017

Jayesh Sanghrajka, Resolution Professional for Nirmal Lifestyle Realty Private Limited. .. Applicant IN THE MATTER BETWEEN: The Central Board of Trustees, Employees Provident Fund Organisation .. Petitioner Versus Nirmal Lifestyle Realty Private Limited And Anr. .. Respondents

Mr. Shyam Kapadia a/w. Ms. Shikha Ginodia, Advocates i/by ANM Global for Applicant.

Ms. Shehnaz V. Bharucha, Advocate for Petitioner.

Mr. Aumkar Joshi, Advocate for Respondent No.1 in Interim Application.

CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : AUGUST 25, 2025

P.C.:

1. Heard Mr. Kapadia, learned Advocate for Applicant; Ms.

Bharucha, learned Advocate for Petitioner and Mr. Joshi, learned Advocate for Respondent No.1.

2. The order dated 13.08.2025 stands fully complied with.

3. Ms. Bharucha confirms that Petitioner - The Central Board of Trustees, Employees Provident Fund Organisation have received the amount of Rs.7,49,48,021/- from the Respondent.

4. In that view of the matter, Petitioner has lifted the

1 of 2

11.IA.9308.2025.doc

attachment from its record of Respondent’s property and it no longer subsists. This statement is noted by the Court.

5. Mr. Kapadia would submit that in view of compliance of order dated 13.08.2025 and statement of learned Advocate for Petitioner recorded today this Court should pass appropriate directions to ensure that attachment on private Respondent’s property is immediately vacated / lifted by the Revenue Officer namely the City Survey Office, Mulund pursuant to the orders dated 29.06.2000, 21.07.2011 and 26.03.2012. If any adverse entry is made in Revenue record / property card, inter alia, with respect to above attachment, the same shall be forthwith deleted by the City Survey Office in respect of the Petitioner’s property.

6. City Survey Officer shall act on a server copy of this order downloaded from the High Court website and ensure that there is no delay in vacating / lifting / removing attachment on the private property of the Respondent without any delay whatsoever.

7. In view of the above, Interim Application and Writ Petition

are both disposed.

H. H. SAWANT

Digitally signed by HARSHADA HARSHADAHANUMANTSAWANT HANUMANTSAWANTDate:2025.08.25 20:20:53 +0530

2 of 2