Manan Nipun Thakkar v. Nipun Thakkar
Case brief
What is this about?
Substitution of legal representatives of deceased execution applicant Nipun Ishwardas Thakkar by his sons; no-objection/consent affidavit of widow and mother Vijayaben Nipun Thakkar; objection that all three heirs be brought on record; amendment of execution application per annexed Schedule; two-week timelines for carrying out amendments and serving amended proceedings; Bombay High Court, Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction; Abhay Ahuja, J.; Interim Applications 920/2025 and 888/2025 in Execution Applications 1780/2015 and 129/2014; connected I.As. 275/2019 and 274/2019; advocates Rubin Vakil, Disha Mehta, Anjali Gupta, Dishang Shah, Pratik Shah.
What did the court decide?
Interim Applications No. 920 of 2025 and No. 888 of 2025 allowed in terms of prayer Clauses (b) and (c): the Applicants are permitted to be brought on record as legal representatives of the deceased Applicant, Mr. Nipun Ishwardas Thakkar, and to amend the Execution Application and proceedings therein in terms of the annexed Schedule; amendments within two weeks, service of amended proceedings within two weeks thereafter, with affidavit of service.