Allowed¶2

Sandeep Jawahar Shah v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Bombay HC21 Jan 2025IA/853/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Interim application allowed; leave to amend prayer clause granted; amendment to be carried out forthwith during the course of the day; direction sought to State of Maharashtra to conduct enquiry by State CID within particular time frame; Criminal Writ Petition No. 4245 of 2018; Bombay High Court; Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction; coram Revati Mohite Dere and Dr. Neela Gokhale, JJ.; decided 19 March 2025.

What did the court decide?

Leave to amend the prayer clause (so as to seek a direction to Respondent No.1-State of Maharashtra to conduct an enquiry by the State CID within a particular time frame); amendment directed to be carried out forthwith during the course of the day; application disposed of. ¶2

Sandeep Jawahar Shah vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors. — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

904-ia-853-2024.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶3

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 853 OF 2024

¶5

¶6

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4245 OF 2018

¶7

Sandeep Jawahar Shah	…..Applicant
In the Matter in Between:
Sandeep Jawahar Shah	…..Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.	…..Respondents

¶8

Mr. Samir Kumbhakoni, with Ms. Anjali Shaw & Mr. Chaitanya Joshi, for the Applicant/Petitioner.

¶9

Ms. P. P. Shinde, APP for Respondent No.1-State.

¶10

Mr. Nagraj Shinde, with Mr. Prasad Kamthe, for Respondent Nos.2,3 and 4.

¶11

CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE &

¶12

DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ.

¶13

DATE : 19^th MARCH 2025.

¶14

P.C.:-

¶15

By the aforesaid Interim Application, the Applicant seeks

¶16

leave to amend the prayer clause thereby, seeking a direction to the Respondent No.1-State of Maharashtra to conduct an enquiry by the State CID within a particular time frame.

¶17