Tata Aig General Ins.Co.Ltd., Mumbai v. Palwindar Kaur, Wd/O. Sukhchain Singh and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bare administrative adjournment order of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction), Coram M. M. Sathaye, J., dated 23rd July 2025, passed due to paucity of time. Matters at Board Serial Nos. 17-22 & 24, 25-35 (listed 19/08/2025 for Disposal/Admission), 36-38 & 40 (20/08/2025, Admission), 41-50 (20/08/2025, Order), 52-59 (21/08/2025, Order) and 61-65 (21/08/2025, Final Hearing Board as per its turn) adjourned accordingly. Existing interim/ad-interim orders to continue till next date; future interim orders unaffected. Contains no party names, counsel, statutes, precedents, framed issues or substantive holdings.
What did the court decide?
Administrative adjournment order: listed Board matters (Serial Nos. 17 to 22 & 24; 25 to 35; 36 to 38 & 40; 41 to 50; 52 to 59; 61 to 65) could not be heard due to paucity of time and stand adjourned per the chart (19/08/2025 to 21/08/2025, by category: Disposal / Admission / Order / Final Hearing Board); interim or ad-interim orders existing on 23/07/2025 continue till the next date, and any such orders granted meanwhile remain unaffected.