Amit Dattatray Londhe v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail, interim order, Bombay High Court, Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction, investment-scheme claimants described as victims, Siddesh Mohire, Suryakant Mohire, Dhanyash Investment, disputed deposits and returns verified through bank entries, attendance before Investigating Officer, no coercive steps, interim relief continued, stand over, Maharashtra. Parties: Sandesh Vishnu Pawar; Sunil Dattaram Gunjal; Amit Dattatray Londhe; Amit Dattatraya Londhe; intervenor represented by Adv. S. B. Bhatagunaki; APP Rutuja Ambekar for the State.
What did the court decide?
No final decision on anticipatory bail. Interim protection pending verification of deposits: in ABA/3089/2024, no coercive steps against the Applicant in the meanwhile; in ABA/2906/2024, interim relief granted earlier continues till the next hearing. Each Applicant directed to attend the Investigating Officer's office on 1-3 March 2025 to submit and explain bank entries; both matters stood over to 10 March 2025 (ABA/3089/2024 under the caption 'For Urgent Circulation').