Sangita N. Jhaveri v. Hemant Ganpatlal Bhavsar and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Execution – Order XXI Rule 22 notice made absolute on appearance of judgment debtors without objection; Registry to proceed in execution; interim applications erroneously filed in execution permitted to be withdrawn, but Execution Court cannot grant liberty to file them in the Suit; decree holder's IA(L) withdrawn as infructuous. Parties: Hemant Ganpatlal Bhavsar & Anr. (Applicants/Decree Holders) v. Sangita N. Jhaveri & Ors. (Respondents/Judgment Debtors). Advocates: Shantanu Chandratre (Applicants); Rahul Hakani with Monel Thakkar (Respondents); Hakani also appearing for the Applicant for withdrawal of IA(L) 30631/2025. High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction; Coram: Abhay Ahuja, J.; decided 24 November 2025; EXA No. 533 of 2023; I.A. Nos. 5384 & 5385 of 2025; Notice No. 21 of 2025; I.A. (L) No. 30631 of 2025. No precedent cited.
What did the court decide?
Notice under Order XXI Rule 22 made absolute; Registry to proceed in execution in accordance with law; Interim Applications Nos. 5384 and 5385 of 2025 disposed as withdrawn (without liberty to file them in the Suit); Interim Application (L) No. 30631 of 2025 disposed as withdrawn.