Dismissed¶20
Commissioner of Cgst and Central Excise v. Reliance Industries Limited
Bombay HCIA/4989/2025
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Praecipe for speaking to the minutes; sought deletion/omission of paragraph 8 of order dated 3 September 2025; Court held paragraph 8 only recorded what transpired and did not reflect on Mr. Karan Adik personally; costs of Rs.50,000/- on Union of India with inquiry, fixing responsibility and recovery from officer concerned dictated but recalled at Mr. Adik's persuasion; Karan Adik present in person; Interim Application (L) No. 26134 of 2023 in Central Excise Appeal No. 178 of 2019; Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Mumbai (LTU) v. M/s. Reliance Industries Ltd.; Bombay High Court, Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction; decided 08 September 2025.
What did the court decide?
None; the praecipe was dismissed and paragraph 8 was not omitted. ¶20