Imtiaz Sharafali Furniturewalla v. Adamji Mahomedally

Bombay HC16 Sept 2025IA/4721/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Execution — compliance with order dated 27.11.2025 — handover of keys of suit premises (godown) — dispute whether a locked internal room exists — verification permitted — adjourned to 07.01.2026 — Interim Application 4721/2025 in Execution Application 2128/2022 — Bombay High Court, OOCJ — Rajesh S. Patil, J. — 24.12.2025.

What did the court decide?

Handover of two keys of the premises to the applicant recorded; matter stood over to 7 January 2026 to enable the applicant to verify whether any room inside the premises is locked and its keys not handed over. No final disposal. ¶¶21

Imtiaz Sharafali Furniturewalla vs Adamji Mahomedally — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Diksha Rane 502. ia 4721-25.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶3

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 4721/2025 IN EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.2128/2022

¶4

IMTIAZ SHARAFALI FURNITUREWALLA ..APPLICANT VS. ADAMJI MOHAMEDALLY ..RESPONDENT

¶5

Mr. Harsh Seth i/b. MDP Legal for the applicant. Mr. Rustom Pardiwalla a/w. Adv. Rushabh Thakkar for the respondent nos. 2 and 3.

¶6

CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

¶7

DATE : 24 DECEMBER 2025.

¶8

P.C. :

¶9

1) When the matter was called out at 1:19 p.m., Mr. Pardiwalla,

¶10

on instructions from respondent no. 2, who is present in the Court, submitted that his client would comply with the order dated 27 November 2025 today, within two hours.

¶11

2) Mr. Seth, learned counsel appearing for the applicant, submitted that when the keys are handed over today, Mr. Pardiwalla should ensure that the keys of the front door as well as the internal rooms of the premises are also handed over.

¶12

3) Mr. Pardiwalla responded by stating that the premises is a

¶13

¶14

Diksha Rane 502. ia 4721-25.doc

¶15

godown and that there cannot be any rooms in a godown. He further submitted that the keys of the main door would be handed over.

¶16

4) The matter is to be called out again at 4:00 p.m.

¶17

(Rajesh S. Patil, J.)

¶18

5) This matter is now called out at 4.29 p.m.

¶19

6) Mr. Pardiwalla, learned counsel who is present along with respondent no.2 has handed over two keys to Mr. Seth who has accepted keys on behalf of his client – applicant.

¶20

7) Mr. Seth submits that, as per the instructions received from his client, there is an issue as to whether there exists any room inside the suit premises which is locked and whose keys have not been handed over. He seeks some time to physically verify whether any such room exists and, if so, whether it is locked and the keys thereof are not available with his client.

¶21

8) In order to permit the applicant to verify whether any room is situated inside the subject premises and whether it is locked ?, stand over to 7 January 2026 .

¶22

(Rajesh S. Patil, J.)

¶23

¶24

Signed by: Diksha Rane Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 24/12/2025 20:20:49

Imtiaz Sharafali Furniturewalla v. Adamji Mahomedally

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Imtiaz Sharafali Furniturewalla v. Adamji Mahomedally

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

New India Co. Operative Bank Ltd. vs Kailash Vijay kanade

Dattaram Haribhau Sanap vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. Special Land Acquisition Officer, Nashik and Ors.

Mrs Sujata Shreya Dipesh Kute vs Dipesh Dashrath Kute

The State of Marharashtra through through the Deputy Collector vs Banubai Devidas Thakur Dec.Thr. Lrs. Baburao D Thakur Dec. Thr. Lrs.

The State of Maharashtra through the Deputy Collector Land Acquisition vs Banubai Devidas Thakur Deceased

Sandeep Shanmukhananda Pillai vs Tejal Sandeep Pillai