Disposed¶33

Priyanka Communications India Pvt. Ltd. v. Tata Capital Financial Services Limited

Bombay HC17 Dec 2025IA/434/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Procedural adjournment order, Bombay High Court Commercial Division (Abhay Ahuja, J., 23 July 2025), Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd v. Priyanka Communications (India) Pvt. Ltd, Commercial Summary Suit No.87 of 2022 / Summons for Judgment No.36 of 2023: hearing of Summons for Judgment and Defendant No.1's Order VII Rule 11 CPC rejection-of-plaint and leave-to-defend applications deferred to 11 September 2025 at 04:00 p.m.; interim moratorium under Section 95 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 noted for Defendants No.2 and 3; no cases cited, no substantive holding.

What did the court decide?

At the parties' joint request, the matter was listed on 11 September 2025 at 04:00 p.m. for Mr. J.P. Sen, learned Senior Counsel for Defendant No.1, to conclude his arguments; no merits ruling was made. ¶33

Priyanka Communications India Pvt. Ltd. vs Tata… — Insolvency and Bankruptcy | Bombay HC (2025)

¶1

21-SJ-36-2023.s.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION

¶3

SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.36 OF 2023 IN

¶4

COMMERCIAL SUMMARY SUIT NO.87 OF 2022

¶5

TATA CAPITAL FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED )...PLAINTIFF V/s. PRIYANKA COMMUNICATIONS (INDIA) PVT. LTD AND OTHERS )...DEFENDANTS

¶6

WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.434 OF 2025 IN

¶7

COMMERCIAL SUMMARY SUIT NO.87 OF 2022

¶8

WITH

¶9

COMMERCIAL SUMMARY SUIT NO.87 OF 2022 WITH

¶10

INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO.8951 OF 2020

¶11

¶12

COMMERCIAL SUMMARY SUIT NO.87 OF 2022

¶13

WITH

¶14

INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO.27737 OF 2024 IN

¶15

COMMERCIAL SUMMARY SUIT NO.87 OF 2022

¶16

WITH

¶17

LEAVE PETITION NO.10 OF 2021 IN

¶18

COMMERCIAL SUMMARY SUIT NO.87 OF 2022

¶19

Digitally
signed by
KIRAN KIRANSANJAY
SANJAY GHUGE
GHUGE Date:2025.07.23
21:16:11
+0530

¶20

Mr.Rohan Savant, Mr.Shadab Jan, Mr.Sachin Chandarana a/w. Mr.Aagam Mehta i/by Manilal Kher Ambalal & Co., Advocate for the Plaintiff.

¶21

Mr.Nadeem Shama a/w Mr.Ku Rehmat Lokhandwala, Mr.Abuzar Khan i/b PAN India Legal Services LLP, Advocates for the Defendants.

¶22

CORAM : ABHAY AHUJA, J. DATE : 23^rd JULY 2025

KSG 1/3

21-SJ-36-2023.s.doc

P.C. :

When the matter is called out, Mr.Nadeem Shama, learned Counsel appears for the Defendants and submits that Mr. J.P. Sen learned Senior Counsel is leading him in the matter.

¶27

Mr.Shama, learned Counsel also submits that as against Defendants No.2 and 3 proceedings under Section 95 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 have been filed and there is an interim moratorium in respect of the said Defendants.

¶28

That Mr.Sen, learned Senior Counsel would continue his arguments for Defendant No.1 and that some time be granted as he is not available at the moment.

¶29

It is observed that earlier Mr.Chetan Kapadia, learned Senior Counsel had concluded his arguments in support of the Summons for Judgment, however, Mr.Sen, learned Senior Counsel had commenced his arguments in support of the application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for rejection of plaint and also for leave to defend.

¶30

KSG 2/3

¶31

21-SJ-36-2023.s.doc

¶32