Asian Paints Limited v. Vinod Satyaprakashji Mittal
Case brief
What is this about?
Trade mark infringement; copyright infringement; passing off; paints and wall putty/enamel products; deceptive and confusing similarity; ASIANGOLD wall putty; SUPREME GLOSS premium enamel; ASIAN PAINTS/ASIAN registered marks; TRUCARE/TRUECARE wall putty label; APCOLITE GLOSS premium enamel label; pirated artwork; trade dress; confirmation of ad-interim relief as interim relief; uncontested matter — defendant absent despite service; prima facie findings not displaced; temporary injunction in terms of prayer clauses (a)(b)(c); Court Receiver discharged without passing of accounts; receiver's costs payable by plaintiff within eight weeks.
What did the court decide?
Interim Application allowed: ad-interim reliefs of 10th December, 2024 and 28th July, 2025 confirmed as interim relief; Defendant restrained in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and (c) (temporary injunctions against use of the impugned ASIANGOLD/SUPREME GLOSS marks, labels, artworks and trade dress infringing the Plaintiff's trade marks, copyrights and passing off); Court Receiver discharged without passing of accounts, with the Plaintiff to pay the Receiver's expenses/charges/costs within eight weeks on demand.