Disposed¶32

Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation Thr.Its the Executive Engineer v. Smt. Ramabai Laxman Malusare (Dead) through Legal Heirs 1A. Dhondiba Laxman Malusare and Ors.

Bombay HC22 Sept 2025IA/4034/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Procedural costs order, Bombay High Court, 08-05-2025, Sharmila U. Deshmukh J.; First Appeal Nos. 624/625/627/628/633-638/640/641/855/856/1507 of 2014 with Interim Applications 3356, 3367, 3422, 4034, 7949 of 2025; Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation v. Baban Sadu Rajivade; improper vacation circulation on praecipe; misapprehension; 121-matter board; costs Rs.2500 per appeal; Kirtikar Law library; compliance 3 July 2025; doubling of costs on default.

What did the court decide?

Interim order imposing costs of Rs.2500/- per Appeal on the Appellants, payable to the Kirtikar Law library within 4 weeks; compliance reporting stood over to 3rd July 2025, failing which costs to be doubled. ¶32

Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation Thr.Its the Executive Engineer vs Smt. Ramabai Laxman Malusare (Dead) through Legal Heirs 1A. Dhondiba Laxman Malusare and Ors. — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

14-FA-624-14 & ors.doc

¶2

JYOTI RAJESH MANE

¶3

Digitally signed by JYOTI RAJESH MANE Date: 2025.05.14 12:11:02 +0530

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

14. FIRST APPEAL NO. 624 OF 2014

¶6

Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Cor...Appellant. por.thro.its The Executive Engineer Neera Deoghar Project

¶7

Versus

¶8

Shri. Baban Sadu Rajivade And Ors ...Respondents.

¶9

AND 15. FIRST APPEAL NO. 625 OF 2014 AND 16. FIRST APPEAL NO. 627 OF 2014 AND 17. FIRST APPEAL NO. 628 OF 2014 AND 18. FIRST APPEAL NO. 633 OF 2014 AND 19. FIRST APPEAL NO. 634 OF 2014 AND 20. FIRST APPEAL NO. 635 OF 2014 AND 21. FIRST APPEAL NO. 636 OF 2014 AND 22. FIRST APPEAL NO. 637 OF 2014 AND 23. FIRST APPEAL NO. 638 OF 2014 AND 24. FIRST APPEAL NO. 640 OF 2014 AND 25. FIRST APPEAL NO. 641 OF 2014 AND 26. FIRST APPEAL NO. 855 OF 2014 AND 27. FIRST APPEAL NO. 856 OF 2014 AND

¶10

1 of 3

¶11

Mane

¶12

14-FA-624-14 & ors.doc

¶13

28. FIRST APPEAL NO. 1507 OF 2014

¶14

AND

¶15

31. INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3356 OF 2025 AND

¶16

32. INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3367 OF 2025 AND

¶17

33. INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3422 OF 2025 AND

¶18

34. INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 4034 OF 2025 AND

¶19

36. INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 7949 OF 2025

¶20

Mr. Ashish Gabhale, i/b. Jay & Co.for the Appellant. Mr. A.R. Patil, AGP for the State.

¶21

Ms. Amrita Kherkar i/b. P.H.Potnis, for the Respondents.(In sr. No. 14, 16 to 22, 25, 27, 31 to 34 and 36)

¶22

——————

¶23

Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.

¶24

Date : May 8 , 2025.

¶25

P. C. :

¶26

1. The matters were circulated on the second last day of the Vacation on praecipe that the Appeals are of the year 2014 and are pending admission and there is no stay which has been granted. In view of the said submission this Court placed the matters on the circulation board. Upon calling of the matters the learned counsel for the Appellants submits that the Appeals are already admitted and stay was also granted under certain conditions and that the Appeals were circulated on a misapprehension.

¶27

2. Considering that the Appellant’s matters were circulated and listed on board having 121 matters, this Court had to refuse circulation

¶28

2 of 3

¶29

Mane

¶30

14-FA-624-14 & ors.doc

¶31

to the other urgent matters. The Advocates cannot be permitted to adopt such casual approach while seeking circulation especially on the second last day of the Vacation and the adjournment cannot be granted without imposing costs.

¶32

3. In the light of the above the Appellants are directed to pay costs of Rs.2500/- per Appeal to be paid to the Kirtikar Law library, within a period of 4 weeks from today. For reporting compliance of the deposit of costs stand over to 3^rd July 2025 .

¶33

4. In the event the costs is not paid before the next date, cost will be doubled on the next occasion.

¶34

[Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]

¶35

3 of 3

¶36

Mane

Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation Thr.Its the Executive Engineer v. Smt. Ramabai Laxman Malusare (Dead) through Legal Heirs 1A. Dhondiba Laxman Malusare and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation Thr.Its the Executive Engineer v. Smt. Ramabai Laxman Malusare (Dead) through Legal Heirs 1A. Dhondiba Laxman Malusare and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Varun Godha vs Balaji Enterprises

The Board of Mumbai Port Authority vs Sale Proceeds of the Vessel Mv Karnika Imo No. 8521220

Integro Finserv Private Limited vs Nandighosh Infrastructure and Logistics

Smt. Shakuntala Arjunrao Pawar vs State of Maharashtra through Special Land Acquisition Officer and Anr.

Trust Travel and Tours Private Limited vs Shabbir Amirali Rawjee

Bandra Trilok Co. Operative Housing Society Ltd. vs Shree Ahuja Properties Private Limited