Disposed¶¶15
Rakesh Thomas Jadav v. the State of Maharashtra through Its Additional Chief Secretary and 6 Ors.
Bombay HCIA/3575/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
IA 3575/2024 in W.P. 892/2024, Bombay High Court (OOCJ); applicant Rakesh Thomas Jadav; respondents include State of Maharashtra (Resp. No. 1) and SRA (Resp. Nos. 2 and 3); notice ordered to proposed respondents 6a-6f per paragraph No. 2 of Application; returnable 26 March 2025; 'Hamdust permitted'; Bench: A. S. Gadkari and Kamal Khata, JJ.; counsel: Shakuntala A. Mudbidri (applicant), Usha Rahi AGP (State), Vishwanath Patil with Akshay Naidu (Resp. 2 & 3 SRA).
What did the court decide?
Issuance of notice to the proposed Respondent Nos. 6a to 6f (identified in paragraph No. 2 of the Application), returnable on 26th March, 2025; 'Hamdust permitted' (term reproduced as printed); matter adjourned to the return date. ¶¶15