High Brow Market Reserach Investiment Advisor Pvt… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2025)

High Brow Market Reserach Investiment Advisor Pvt… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Interlocutory directions: Mr. Ajay Chavan (First Informant, C.R. No.231 of 2018) impleaded as respondent No.4 with notice returnable 22 April 2025; private service by petitioners' counsel with affidavit of service; Kudal Police Station officer to inform him of the next date; interim protection granted by the Apex Court continued; CBI requested to hand over investigation papers of C.R. No.120 of 2019 to the SIT; substantive consideration of clubbing of the two FIRs deferred; matter stand over to 22 April 2025 (Supplementary Board).

Issue for consideration

In what manner the FIRs registered at D.N. Nagar Police Station, Mumbai, and Kudal Police Station, Sindhudurg, can be clubbed together — question remitted by the Supreme Court to this Court; substantive orders deferred to a future date. +3 more

Court's answer

The concerned Officer from Kudal Police Station, Sindhudurg, to inform First Informant Mr. Ajay Chavan of the next date to enable him to appear; appropriate orders on the petition (including clubbing of the two FIRs) to be passed thereafter.

Ratio / Principle

In view of the charge-sheet filed in the Kudal Police Station case and in light of the Apex Court's order, Mr. Ajay Chavan, First Informant in C.R. No.231 of 2018, is impleaded as party respondent No.4 in the writ petition; leave granted; amendment to be carried out during the course of the day.

Key takeaways

Notice to be issued to the newly added respondent No.4 after amendment, returnable on 22 April 2025; hamdast permitted.ratio¶¶94
In addition to Court notice, petitioners' counsel to serve the newly added respondent No.4 by private notice and file affidavit of service before the next date.ratio¶¶96
Matter to stand over to 22 April 2025, to be listed on the Supplementary Board.ratio

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Bombay (Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction), order dated 8 April 2025 in Criminal Writ Petition No.4101 of 2022 (Debaprasad Nanda & Anr. v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.) with intervenor applications (IAs Nos.3268, 3273, 3276, 3277, 3278, 3279, 3281, 3283, 3284, 3287 of 2024). Acting on the Supreme Court's order dated 24 February 2025 in Criminal Appeal Nos.940-941 of 2025 — which set aside paragraph 6 of this Court's interim order dated 12 January 2024 transferring to the CBI the investigation of two FIRs, C.R. No.120 of 2019 (D.N. Nagar Police Station, Mumbai; informant Arun Sheth) and C.R. No.231 of 2018 (Kudal Police Station, Sindhudurg; informant Ajay Chavan) — the Division Bench (Revati Mohite Dere & Dr. Neela Gokhale, JJ.) impleaded Mr. Ajay Chavan as respondent No.4 (charge-sheet having been filed in the Kudal case), issued notice returnable 22 April 2025 with private service and affidavit of service, directed the Kudal Police Station officer to inform the informant, continued the interim protection granted by the Apex Court, and requested the CBI to hand over the papers of its investigation in C.R. No.120 of 2019 to the Special Investigation Team constituted pursuant to the Apex Court's order; consideration of the clubbing of the two FIRs deferred; matter stand over to 22 April 2025.

NISHA SANDEEP CHITNIS

Digitally signed by NISHA SANDEEP CHITNIS Date: 2025.04.09 18:32:08 +0530

906-wp.4101.2022(gr).doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4101 OF 2022

Debaprasad Nanda And Anr ...Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents

WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3273 OF 2024 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4101 OF 2022 Hemant Agarwal ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents

WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3284 OF 2024 IN

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4101 OF 2022

Swapnil Vijaykumar Prajapati ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent

WITH

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3287 OF 2024 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4101 OF 2022

Mohit Shyamratan Chhaparwal ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent

1/9

N. S. Chitnis

906-wp.4101.2022(gr).doc

WITH

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3277 OF 2024 IN

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4101 OF 2022

Laxmikant Lalmani Sharma ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents

WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3278 OF 2024 IN

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4101 OF 2022

Mohit Shyamratan Chhaparwal ...Applicant Versus Arun Seth & Anr. ...Respondents

WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3279 OF 2024 IN

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4101 OF 2022

High Brow Market Research Investment Advisor Pvt.Ltd. ...Applicant Versus Arun Seth & Anr. ...Respondents

WITH

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3281 OF 2024

IN

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4101 OF 2022

Laxmikant Lalmani Sharma ...Applicant Versus Arun Seth & Anr. ...Respondents

2/9

N. S. Chitnis

906-wp.4101.2022(gr).doc

WITH

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3276 OF 2024 IN

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4101 OF 2022

Swapnil Vijaykumar Prajapati ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents

WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3268 OF 2024 IN

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4101 OF 2022

High Brow Market Research Investment Advisor Pvt.Ltd. ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents

WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3283 OF 2024 IN

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4101 OF 2022

Hemant Agarwal ...Applicant Versus Arun Seth & Anr. ...Respondents

Mr. Samarth Moray i/b Ms. Shivani Suryakant Shinde for the Petitioners.

Mrs. P.P.Shinde, A.P.P for the Respondent-State.

Mr. Vedchetan Patil a/w Ms. Sunayna Kashid and Mr. Delzeen Dastoor

3/9

N. S. Chitnis

906-wp.4101.2022(gr).doc

for the Applicant/Intervenor in IA/3287/2024, IA/3277/2024, IA/3278/2024 and IA/3281/2024.

Mr. Gautam Tiwari i/b Ms. Tasneem Khatau for the Applicant/Intervenor in IA/3273/2024, IA/3284/2024, IA/3279/2024, IA/3276/2024, IA/3268/2024 & IA/3283/2024.

Mr. Amit Munde, Spl.P.P for the Respondent No.3 – CBI

Mr. Omprakash Jha i/b The Law Point for the Respondent No.2 – SEBI.

Sr. Police Inspector – Mr. Rajendra Machhindar from D.N. Nagar Police Station, is present.

CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE & DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ.

DATE : 8^th APRIL 2025

P.C. :

Pursuant to the order passed by the Apex Court on 24^th

February 2025 in Criminal Appeal No.940 of 2025 with Criminal

Appeal No.941 of 2025 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Criminal) Nos.14797 of

2024 and 3045 of 2025), the aforesaid matters are listed before us.

The said order dated 24^th February 2025 reads thus:-

“ORDER

Application seeking permission to file Special Leave Petition in Diary No.51083/2024 is allowed.

4/9

N. S. Chitnis

906-wp.4101.2022(gr).doc

Delay condoned in Diary No.51083/2024.

Leave granted.

Heard the learned senior counsel appearing for the appellants, the learned counsel appearing for the State, the learned ASG appearing for the Central Bureau of Investigation and the learned counsel appearing for the original complainants.

A writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was filed by the contesting private respondents before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay. They are claiming to be the victims of a large scale offence which has been investigated on the basis of a First Information Report (for short, "the FIR") registered at D.N. Nagar Police Station in Mumbai. The first prayer in the writ petition is for transfer of all the FIRs for consolidated investigation. There are other prayers sought against SEBI.

In the impugned order dated 12^th January, 2024, the High Court has noted that there were only two cases in Maharashtra, one was the subject matter of the FIR investigated into by D.N. Nagar Police Station and the other one is with Kudal Police Station, Sindhudurg. Without recording any reasons, the High Court has transferred the investigation of both the cases to the CBI. The impugned order is an interim order. In our view, this drastic order of transfer of the investigation to the CBI could not have been passed without recording any reasons and that also by way of an interim order.

There cannot be any dispute that the investigation of cases registered at D.N. Nagar Police Station and Kudal

5/9

N. S. Chitnis

906-wp.4101.2022(gr).doc

Police Station, Sindhudurg, will have to be clubbed together. However, there was no reason to appoint CBI as the investigating agency without recording any reasons. The learned ASG pointed out that the investigation has been completed by the CBI.

We set aside the direction in paragraph 6 of the impugned order dated 12^th January, 2024. The High Court will consider in what manner the FIRs which are registered at D.N. Nagar Police Station and Kudal Police Station, Sindhudurg, can be clubbed together. The High Court may also consider of appointing a Special Investigation Team of senior Police Officers. We make it clear that as soon as the High Court passes appropriate directions in this behalf, the concerned Investigating Officer of the CBI shall handover the entire material collected during the investigation to the concerned Police Station or the investigating agency appointed by the High Court. The material will become a part of investigation carried out in connection with the two FIRs. Interim protection granted under the order dated 25^th October, 2024 will continue as regards the appellant nos.2 to 4 in Criminal Appeal No.940 of 2025 @ SLP (Crl.) No.14797/2024 with the modification that the prohibition will apply to concerned Police Station or investigating agency which may be appointed by the High Court. The protection will continue till further orders are passed by the High Court.

Subject to the above modification, the Appeals are disposed of.”

We have heard the learned counsel for the parties. It

appears that there are two C.Rs; one C.R. No.120 of 2019 registered

6/9

N. S. Chitnis

906-wp.4101.2022(gr).doc

with the D. N. Nagar Police Station, Mumbai, and another i.e. C.R. No.231 of 2018 registered with the Kudal Police Station, Sindhudurg. The said FIRs were registered on 19^th March 2019 and 29^th September 2018 respectively. The informants in both the FIRs are different i.e. in C.R. No.120 of 2019 registered with the D. N. Nagar Police Station, Mumbai, the First Informant is one Mr. Arun Sheth and in C.R. No.231 of 2018 registered with the Kudal Police Station, Sindhudurg, the First Informant is one Mr. Ajay Chavan.

This Court vide order dated 12^th January 2024 transferred the investigation of both the CRs to CBI.

Today, we are informed that charge-sheet has been filed in the case registered with the Kudal Police Station, Sindhudurg, and hence we deem it appropriate in the light of the order passed by the Apex Court to implead Mr. Ajay Chavan, the First Informant in C.R. No.231 of 2018 registered with the Kudal Police Station, Sindhudurg, as party respondent No.4 in the aforesaid writ petition. Leave granted.

7/9

N. S. Chitnis

906-wp.4101.2022(gr).doc

Amendment to be carried out during the course of the day.

After amendment is carried out, issue notice to the newly

added respondent No.4, returnable on 22^nd April 2025 . Hamdast permitted.

In addition to Court notice, learned counsel for the

petitioners to serve the newly added respondent No.4 by private notice and file affidavit of service before the next date.

The concerned Officer from Kudal Police Station, Sindhudurg, to also inform the First Informant Mr. Ajay Chavan, of the next date, in order to enable him to appear in the aforesaid petition. Appropriate orders will thereafter be passed in the aforesaid petition.

Stand over to 22^nd April 2025. To be listed on the

Supplementary Board.

8/9

N. S. Chitnis

906-wp.4101.2022(gr).doc

Needless to state, that the interim protection granted by the Apex Court, shall continue till the next date.

In the meantime, since Special Investigation Team (SIT) has been constituted pursuant to the order passed by the Apex Court, we request, the CBI to hand over all the papers pertaining to the investigation carried out by them in C.R. No.120 of 2019 registered with the D. N. Nagar Police Station, Mumbai, to the SIT, which is constituted.

All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this

order.

DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

9/9

N. S. Chitnis

Procedural history

How this case reached the court

AI extract

Order under challenge
Interim order dated 12 January 2024 of this Court transferring the investigation of both C.Rs (C.R. No.120 of 2019 and C.R. No.231 of 2018) to the CBI; by order dated 24 February 2025 the Supreme Court set aside the direction in paragraph 6 of that order.¶¶87
High Court of Judicature at Bombay · 12 January 2024
Prior proceeding
Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 482 CrPC, 1973 filed by contesting private respondents claiming to be victims of a large scale offence based on FIR at D.N. Nagar Police Station, Mumbai; first prayer for transfer of all FIRs for consolidated investigation; other prayers against SEBI.¶¶72
Prior proceeding
Two C.Rs: C.R. No.120 of 2019 registered with D.N. Nagar Police Station, Mumbai, and C.R. No.231 of 2018 registered with Kudal Police Station, Sindhudurg.¶¶83
Prior proceeding
The two FIRs were registered on 19th March 2019 and 29th September 2018 respectively.¶¶84
Prior proceeding
Informants in the two FIRs are different: First Informant in C.R. No.120 of 2019 is Mr. Arun Sheth; First Informant in C.R. No.231 of 2018 is Mr. Ajay Chavan.¶¶85
Prior proceeding
Investigation was completed by the CBI, as pointed out by the learned ASG before the Supreme Court.¶¶78
Prior proceeding
Interim protection had been granted under order dated 25 October 2024; the Supreme Court continued it (as modified, extending it to the Police Station/agencies appointed by the High Court) for appellant nos.2 to 4 in Criminal Appeal No.940 of 2025.¶¶79
Prior proceeding
By order dated 24 February 2025 in Criminal Appeal No.940 of 2025 with Criminal Appeal No.941 of 2025 (arising out of SLP (Criminal) Nos.14797 of 2024 and 3045 of 2025), the Supreme Court set aside paragraph 6 of the order dated 12 January 2024, remitted to the High Court the question of clubbing the two FIRs and the possibility of appointing an SIT, and directed the CBI Investigating Officer to hand over the collected material.¶¶79
Prior proceeding
The present matters were listed pursuant to the Apex Court order dated 24 February 2025, which is reproduced in this judgment.¶¶63
Prior proceeding
Charge-sheet has been filed in the case registered with the Kudal Police Station, Sindhudurg.¶¶88
Prior proceeding
A Special Investigation Team (SIT) has been constituted pursuant to the order passed by the Apex Court.¶¶104