Rajesh Ramji Nandu and Anr. v. Hanware Realty
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay High Court interim order correcting clerical/error in earlier order dated 27 June 2025: paragraph 3 wrongly recorded that Plaintiff no.2 was served; corrected to show SRA (Slum Rehabilitation Authority, Defendant no.5) is a formal party per counsel Ashwini Jadhav. Service on Plaintiff no.2 and Defendants 1–4 (Hanware Realty and others) returned; time granted to effect service; listed 18 September 2025. Suit No. 847 of 2013; plaintiffs Rajesh Ramji Nandu and another; counsel Shweta Rathod (Elixir Legal Services); Judge Abhay Ahuja.
What did the court decide?
Correction of paragraph 3 of the order dated 27 June 2025 (recording that counsel for Defendant no.5 – SRA stated the SRA is a formal party, not that Plaintiff no.2 was served); further time granted to effect service on Plaintiff no.2 and Defendants no.1 to 4 by the next date; matter listed on 18 September 2025.