Tahira Candice Pandit v. Ivy Rose Pacheco
Case brief
What is this about?
Testamentary and intestate jurisdiction; Bombay High Court; Interim Application No.2898 of 2025 in Testamentary Petition No.3069 of 2024; Judges Order (Lodging) No.24292 of 2025; Ivy Rose Pacheco, applicant / original petitioner; Branch Manager of Indian Bank, proposed defendant; inventory of locker belonging to the deceased; ascertainment of original Will; office objections to be removed; final numbering of Judges Order; signature in Chamber; Milind N. Jadhav, J.; disposed 17 September 2025; no substantive adjudication; no costs; no quantum.
What did the court decide?
Procedural directions only: all office objections to the Judges Order to be removed forthwith with Departmental permission to the Advocate for the Petitioner, final number to be assigned, and the Judges Order then to be placed before the Judge in Chamber for signature. No finding recorded on whether the deceased's locker contains the original Will.