Dilip Jethalal Modi v. Shri Bansidhar B. Gupta (Since Deceased) Thr. Lrs. and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
consent terms; settlement; quashing of appellate judgment and decree; RAD Suit No.722 of 1990; RAD Appeal No.5 of 2016; Small Causes Court Mumbai; permanent alternate accommodation (PAAA); redevelopment; transit rent; shifting charges; MCGM water connection penalty; withdrawal of suits and criminal complaints; undertakings to Court; Civil Revision Application No.488 of 2018; Interim Application No.210 of 2025; Bombay High Court; Madhav J. Jamdar; tenancy and redevelopment dispute between Gupta family (applicants) and Modi family (respondents).
What did the court decide?
On the Consent Terms (taken on record and marked 'X', statements accepted as undertakings to the Court): the impugned Judgment and Decree dated 3rd May 2018 of the Appellate Bench, Small Causes Court, Mumbai in RAD Appeal No.5 of 2016 quashed and set aside; the Judgment and Decree dated 31st October 2014 of the Judge, Small Causes Court, Mumbai in RAD Suit No.722 of 1990 confirmed and that suit decreed in terms of the Consent Terms; Civil Revision Application No.488 of 2018 disposed of with no order as to costs; Interim Application No.210 of 2025 also disposed of.