Sanjeeb Uttam Sinaroy v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Change of counsel / advocate-on-record replacement; NOC; Vakilpatra; letter through jail; Bombay High Court Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction; I.A. No.1982 of 2025 and I.A. No.4057 of 2024 in Criminal Appeal No.1104 of 2024 (Sanjeeb Uttam Sinaroy v. State of Maharashtra); connected I.A. No.1618 of 2025 and I.A. No.4063 of 2024 in Criminal Appeal No.1106 of 2024 (Anubha @ Zilik Sanjay Hajara); interim application disposed; earlier advocates (Shriganesh Salba Sawalkar with Vishruti Tari, Shraddha Sagvekar, Tandan Adira) discharged; Veerdhawal Deshmukh engaged; Sharmila S. Kaushik, APP for Respondent-State.
What did the court decide?
Advocate Veerdhawal Deshmukh permitted to represent the Appellant/Applicant on filing his Vakilpatra after obtaining NOC from the Advocate on record; Interim Application No.1982 of 2025 disposed of; the matters to proceed in due course.