Ashok Lalchand Sancheti v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court allowed an interim application by an intervener to be heard in an anticipatory bail matter, relying on the principle that a victim is entitled to be heard. The criminal appeal was adjourned for circulation.
What did the court decide?
Interim application by intervener allowed to make submissions; main application adjourned.
What the court decided
2025:BHC-AS:12965
Diksha Rane 30 IA 1911-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1911/2024 IN
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 836 OF 2024
ASHOK LALCHAND SANCHETI ..APPLICANT
..INTERVENER
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN
RAJNI SUJIT RANA ..APPLICANT
VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR ..RESPONDENTS
Adv. Rakesh Agrawal for applicant in IA.
Adv. Ekta Bhalerao h/f. Adv. Ghanshyam Mishra for applicant in ABA. Ms. P. N. Dabholkar, APP for State.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the intervener (victim) is entitled to be heard in the anticipatory bail application?
Whether the interim protection granted to the applicant stands vacated due to non-appearance?
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Rajni Sujit Rana
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
Rajesh S. Patil
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court