Disposed¶44

M J Shah Enterprise v. Ms Supreme Construction

Bombay HC3 Oct 2025IA/1625/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Consent decree-style disposal by Bombay High Court, O.O.C.J. Keywords: commercial suit; consent terms dated 03.11.2025; undertaking to Court; disposal of suit and interim application; liberty to apply; M/s. M J Shah Enterprise v. M/s. Supreme Constructions and Ors.; Coram Milind N. Jadhav, J.; Bench: single Judge; Document ref: 4.COMS.53.2025.doc. Useful for practitioners tracing consensual settlements of commercial suits before the Bombay High Court in 2025 and for enforcement via undertakings recorded in Consent Terms.

What did the court decide?

Order in terms of Consent Terms dated 03.11.2025 (marked 'X-1'), whose rights and obligations stand as undertakings given to the Court; Commercial Suit No. 53 of 2025 and pending Interim Application No. 1625 of 2025 both disposed; liberty to apply. ¶44

M J Shah Enterprise vs Ms Supreme Construction — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

4.COMS.53.2025.doc

¶2

HARSHADA H. SAWANT (P.A.)

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶5

COMMERCIAL SUIT NO.53 OF 2025 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1625 OF 2025 IN

¶6

COMMERCIAL SUIT NO.53 OF 2025

¶7

M/s. M J Shah Enterprise .. Plaintiff Versus M/s. Supreme Constructions and Ors. Defendants

¶8

Mr. Mohit Khanna a/w. Ms. Pallavi Kulkarni and Ms. Daksha Parmar, Advocates i/by Mr. Prajot H. Jaggi for Plaintiff.

¶9

Mr. Adil Parsurampuria a/w. Ms. Khan Nazreen and Ms. Vishakha Tandel, Advocate i/by P. Y. Shankar for Defendant Nos.1 and 2 and for Applicant.

¶10

CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : NOVEMBER 03, 2025

¶11

P.C.:

¶12

1. Heard Mr. Khanna, learned Advocate for Plaintiff and Mr.

¶13

Parsurampuria, learned Advocate for Defendant Nos.1 and 2 and for Applicant.

¶14

2. Parties have reconciled their disputes and differences and filed Consent Terms. Consent Terms dated 03.11.2025 are taken on record and marked as ‘ X-1 ’ for identification. They are totally running into 12 pages. For reference and convenience, the Consent Terms upto execution clause are scanned and reproduced below:-

¶15

1 of 12

¶16

4.COMS.53.2025.doc

¶17

2 of 12

¶18

4.COMS.53.2025.doc

¶19

3 of 12

¶20

4.COMS.53.2025.doc

¶21

4 of 12

¶22

4.COMS.53.2025.doc

¶23

5 of 12

¶24

4.COMS.53.2025.doc

¶25

6 of 12

¶26

4.COMS.53.2025.doc

¶27

7 of 12

¶28

4.COMS.53.2025.doc

¶29

8 of 12

¶30

4.COMS.53.2025.doc

¶31

9 of 12

¶32

4.COMS.53.2025.doc

¶33

10 of 12

¶34

4.COMS.53.2025.doc

¶35

3. Consent Terms are executed by Plaintiff, Advocate for Plaintiff, Defendant No.1; Advocate for Defendant No.1; Defendant No.2; Advocate for Defendant No.2; Defendant No.3; Advocate for Defendant No.3 and Defendant No.4; Advocate for Defendant No.4.

¶36

11 of 12

¶37

4.COMS.53.2025.doc

¶38

Parties have been identified by their respective Advocates.

¶39

4. Rights and obligations stated in the Consent Terms are taken

¶40

as undertaking given to this Court. Parties are directed to abide by the same.

¶41

5. Order in terms of Consent Terms.