Allowed¶25

Prabhakar Shridhar Gade and Ors. v. Mandaleshwar Madhavrao Kale and Ors.

Bombay HC27 Feb 2025IA/15067/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Leave to file appeal granted by Bombay High Court (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction) to Pujaris/Gurav of temple administered by Respondent Devasthan Trust claiming persons-interested status under Section 2(10) Maharashtra Public Trust Act 1950; impugned order dated 28.06.2023; Interim Applications Nos. 15067 of 2024 and 17042 of 2023; First Appeal (ST) No. 23585 of 2023; parties Prabhakar Shridhar Gade, Hemant Padmakar Gade (Gurav) v. Mandaleshwar Madhavrao Kale and Ors.

What did the court decide?

Leave granted to the Applicants to file appeal challenging the impugned order dated 28.06.2023. ¶25

Prabhakar Shridhar Gade and Ors. vs Mandaleshwar Madhavrao Kale and Ors. — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

904 ia 15067-24 & 17042-23.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 15067 OF 2024

¶4

(leave to file appeal) IN

¶5

SNEHA NITIN CHAVAN

¶6

Digitally signed by SNEHA NITIN CHAVAN Date: 2025.07.25 11:07:59 +0530

¶7

Prabhakar Shridhar Gade and Ors. ...Appellants Versus Mandaleshwar Madhavrao Kale and Ors. ...Respondents

¶8

WITH

¶9

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 17042 OF 2023 (leave to file appeal) IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 23585 OF 2023

¶10

Shri. Hemant Padmakar Gade (Gurav) ...Applicant Versus Mandaleshwar Madhavrao Kale and Ors. ...Respondents

¶11

¶12

Mr. Shriram S. Kulkarni a/w Mr. Sujay Palshikar for the Applicants in IA/15067/2024.

¶13

Mr. A.A. Kumbhkoni, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Tejas Deshmukh, Rohan Utagikar, Onkar Sonvanshi and Meghana Chavhan for the Applicant in IA/17042/2023.

¶14

Mr. Deepak Thakur i/b Mr. Prasad Jangham for Respondent Nos. 1 to 7 in both.

¶15

Mr. Anand Pande for Respondent No.8 in both.

¶16

¶17

P.C. :

¶18

Heard learned counsel for the parties. Perused the record.

¶19

These are the applications are filed by set of Pujaris/Gurav of

¶20

Sneha Chavan

¶21

1/2

¶22

904 ia 15067-24 & 17042-23.doc

¶23

the temple administered by Respondent Devasthan Trust, for grant of leave to file appeal against the impugned Judgment and Order. The Applicants claim to be persons interested under Section 2(10) of the Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1950. After narrating the events and various legal proceedings in respect of the said Trust, it is asserted that it is necessary for the Applicants to file appeal and inform the Court about present state of affairs for better adjudication of the matter.

¶24

It is not disputed that the Applicants are Pujaris/Gurav of the temple administered by the Respondent-Trust.

¶25

Considering the nature of controversy involved, the applications are allowed and leave is granted to the Applicants to file appeal challenging the impugned order dated 28.06.2023.

¶26

Sneha Chavan

¶27

2/2

Prabhakar Shridhar Gade and Ors. v. Mandaleshwar Madhavrao Kale and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prabhakar Shridhar Gade and Ors. v. Mandaleshwar Madhavrao Kale and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Bombay Swadeshi Stores Ltd. Throu. Its Authorised Samson Peter vs Aditya Hotels Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.

Sagar Sanjay Shinde vs Jayashree Janardhan Awatade

Kantilal Babulal Oswal vs Sanket Creations

Sai Milk Phaltan through Proprietor vs Kolhapur District Sahakari Dudh Utpadak Sangh Ltd. Kolhapur

Raju @ Zumarya Baliram Kadam vs State of Maharashtra

M/S. Govind Infratech vs Haresh v. Kagrana HUF Thr. Its Karta Mr. Haresh v. Kagrana and Others