Allowed¶14

Shri. Deendayal Raghunath Yadav (Deceased) Thr. Lrs and Ors. v. Smt. Noorbanoo Abdul Salam Shaikh and Ors.

Bombay HC6 Jan 2025IA/14818/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bombay HC Appellate Side, M. M. Sathaye J., 15-09-2025; IA 14818/2024 in CRA 590/2011; impleadment of legal heirs of deceased applicant Deendayal Raghunath Yadav; condonation of 174-day delay allowed; other landlords already on record; no reply filed; amendment within two weeks; disposed of; applicants' counsel Druti Datar i/b R. S. Datar; respondents' counsel Priya A. Patil i/b Gautam T. Kanchanpurkar; landlord-tenant revision context.

What did the court decide?

Delay of 174 days in filing condoned; legal heirs of deceased Applicant No. 1 (Deendayal Raghunath Yadav) permitted to be brought on record of Civil Revision Application No. 590 of 2011; amendment to be carried out within two weeks; application disposed of in the above terms. ¶14

Shri. Deendayal Raghunath Yadav (Deceased) Thr. Lrs and Ors. vs Smt. Noorbanoo Abdul Salam Shaikh and Ors. — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶14

Issue for consideration

Whether the legal heirs of deceased Applicant No. 1 (Deendayal Raghunath Yadav) may be brought on record in Civil Revision Application No. 590 of 2011 notwithstanding the 174-day delay in filing the application, i.e., whether sufficient cause for condonation of delay exists.

¶12

Court's answer

Considering the averments in the application and the fact that other landlords are already appearing in the Revision Application, sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay.

¶13

Ratio / Principle

The application is allowed and the delay of 174 days is condoned; the legal heirs of deceased Applicant No. 1 are permitted to be brought on record of the Civil Revision Application.

¶14

Key takeaways

The amendment (bringing the legal heirs on record) is to be carried out within two weeks, and the application stands disposed of in these terms.ratio¶18

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Bombay High Court, Appellate Side (M. M. Sathaye, J.), order dated 15 September 2025 in Interim Application No. 14818 of 2024 in Civil Revision Application No. 590 of 2011: Allowed an application by the applicants to bring the legal heirs of deceased Applicant No. 1, Deendayal Raghunath Yadav, on record, condoning a delay of 174 days in filing. Sufficiency of cause was found in the averments of the application and in the circumstance that other landlords were already appearing in the pending Revision Application; no reply was filed by the respondents (Smt. Noorbanoo Abdul Salam Shaikh & Anr.). The legal heirs were permitted to be brought on record, with the amendment to be carried out within two weeks; the application was disposed of accordingly. Counsel: Ms. Druti Datar i/b. Adv. R. S. Datar for the applicants; Adv. Priya A. Patil i/b. Mr. Gautam T. Kanchanpurkar for the respondents.

Shri. Deendayal Raghunath Yadav (Deceased) Thr. Lrs and Ors. v. Smt. Noorbanoo Abdul Salam Shaikh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri. Deendayal Raghunath Yadav (Deceased) Thr. Lrs and Ors. v. Smt. Noorbanoo Abdul Salam Shaikh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Prakash Shantaram Kasbe and Ors. vs Nandu Suresh Mahale and Ors.

National Insurance Company Limited Nanded Thr. the Branch Manager vs Vaishnavi W/O. Amol More and Ors.

Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation Thr. Executive Engineer vs Mr. Anant Saduppa Kamble and Ors.

1. Vijay Ganesh Uttekar and Ors. vs 1. Sunanda Bajirao Bhosale and Ors.

1. Vijay Ganesh Uttekar vs 1. Sunanda Bajirao Bhosale

Ajay Gangabaksh Singh vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.