Allowed¶14

Smt. Ester Kantraj Naidu v. Rostin Kantraj Naidu and Ors.

Bombay HC28 Mar 2025IA/134/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Condonation of delay; 147 days' delay in filing First Appeal (ST) No. 25457 of 2022 condoned by Bombay High Court (M. M. Sathaye, J.) on 21 August 2025; sufficient cause held made out from the extent of delay and averments in the application; no reply opposing delay; leave to amend prayer clause granted.

What did the court decide?

Delay of 147 days in filing the Appeal condoned; leave granted to amend the prayer clause. ¶14

Smt. Ester Kantraj Naidu v. Rostin Kantraj Naidu and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

Smt. Ester Kantraj Naidu v. Rostin Kantraj Naidu and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Commissioner of Customs, Prosecution Cell, Csmia, Mumbai through Patel Paresh Jashwantlal vs Marin D/O Kazuyoshi Kataigi and Ors.

Bhanudas Gopal Gaikwad vs State of Maharashtra Thr. Land Acquisition Officer @ Sub Divisional Officer, Solapur

Muktabai Baburao Adsule and Ors. vs Jambu Bhujappa GUNE(DECEASED)THR.LRS.1A,SUREKHA Jambu Pawar and Ors.

Sou. Shanta Tanaji Lokhande vs Shri. Dadaso Bhavurao Dhavale and Ors.

National Film Development Corporation Ltd., Mumbai vs R. K. Swamy/ Bbdo Advt. Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai Thr.Its Cmd Srinivasan Swamy and Anr.

Shri Rama Ambo Huddar and Ors. vs the State of Maharashtra through the Special Land Acquisition Officer and Anr.