Disposed¶31

Kunal @ Abhishek @ Rahul Barkya Patel v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC16 Jun 2025IA/118/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Kunal @ Abhishek @ Rahul Barkya Patel v. State of Maharashtra; Bombay High Court; Criminal Writ Petition No. 903 of 2023; Interim Application No. 2132 of 2025 (with IA ST No. 13236 of 2023 and IA No. 118 of 2024); Coram A. S. Gadkari and Rajesh S. Patil, JJ.; 16 June 2025; cause of action does not survive - marriage of Applicant's sister called off; genuineness of invitation card at page No. 45 doubted by Authority; APP sought time to verify with Investigating Agency; stand over to 23 June 2025; listed 'For Directions'; no final relief; adjournment only.

What the court decided

AI extract

Kunal @ Abhishek @ Rahul Barkya Patel vs the State of Maharashtra — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

DDR 3. WP 903-23 & ORS..doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶3

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 903 OF 2023

¶5

WITH

¶6

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2132 OF 2025

¶7

¶8

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 903 OF 2023

¶9

WITH

¶10

INTERIM APPLICATION ST. NO. 13236 OF 2023

¶11

¶12

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 903 OF 2023

¶13

WITH

¶14

INTERIM APPLICATION NO.118 OF 2024

¶15

¶16

WRIT PETITION NO. 903 OF 2023

¶17

Kunal @ Abhishek @ Rahul Barkya Patel

¶18

..Petitioner

¶19

vs.

¶20

The State of Maharashtra

¶21

..Respondent

¶22

_______________________________ Ms. Sana Shaikh a/w. Ms. Nisha Lakariya, Ms. Maya Updeshe, Mr. Vipul Ghate, Ms. Ruha Shaikh for Petitioner/Applicant. Smt. Rutuja Ambekar, APP for Respondent - State.

¶23

CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ. DATE : 16^th JUNE, 2025.

¶24

1/2

¶25

DDR 3. WP 903-23 & ORS..doc

¶26

P.C.:-

¶27

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2132 OF 2025 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 903 OF 2023

¶28

The present Application was called out for hearing in the morning session. We had directed learned APP to take instructions regarding the relief prayed for by Applicant. The Application was therefore, kept back and called out for the hearing in the second session.

¶29

In the second session, learned Advocate for Applicant, on instructions, submitted that the cause of action for which the present Application is filed, does not survive at this juncture i.e. marriage of the sister of Applicant has been called off for unforeseen reasons.

¶30

At this stage learned APP, on instructions, submitting that the concerned Authority is having doubt about the genuineness of the invitation card annexed at page No.45 of the Interim Application. She therefore, seeks time to verify the same from the concerned Investigating Agency.

¶31

At her request, stand over to 23^rd June 2025.

¶32

To be listed under the caption “For Directions”.

¶33

(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

¶34

2/2

¶35

Signed by: Diksha Rane Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 17/06/2025 15:32:58

Kunal @ Abhishek @ Rahul Barkya Patel v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Kunal @ Abhishek @ Rahul Barkya Patel v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Poonamsingh Chainsingh Darnal@ Poonam R Darnal and Anr. vs State of Maharashtra Anr.

Sindhil Venkatesh Suryawanshi vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Shriram Padmnabh Poonja vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Mehjabeen F Kadri vs State of Maharashtra

Abhijit Yuvraj Pawar and Anr. vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Vijaykumar Nandlal Kukreja vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.