Disposed¶24

Santosh Karatkar Binavat and Anr. v. Sunita Kailas Bhosale and Ors.

Bombay HC5 Dec 2025IA/11184/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bombay High Court; First Appeal (ST) No.8905 of 2025; Interim Applications 11184 and 11185 of 2025; S. M. Modak, J.; motor accident claims; Claims Tribunal Pune; Award dated 14th March 2024; compensation Rs.15,24,000/-; stay application; deposit of entire amount; notice returnable 3rd December 2025; execution; Santosh Karatkar Binavat; Sunita Kailas Bhosale.

What did the court decide?

Interim directions only: notice to Respondent Nos.1 to 3 / Claimants and notice on the Stay Application, both returnable on 3rd December 2025; liberty to the Appellant to inform the Executing Court of the Appeal and to seek circulation if execution is filed; the question of stay and quantum of deposit expressly left undecided for the returnable date. ¶24

Santosh Karatkar Binavat and Anr. vs Sunita Kailas Bhosale and Ors. — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶24

Issue for consideration

Whether notice should issue in the First Appeal and on the Stay Application to Respondent Nos.1 to 3 / Claimants, and on what returnable date. +1 more

¶24

Court's answer

Notice is to be issued to Respondent Nos.1 to 3 / Claimants in the First Appeal, returnable on 3rd December 2025.

¶24

Ratio / Principle

Notice is also to be issued on the Stay Application, returnable on 3rd December 2025.

¶26

Key takeaways

The question of grant of stay and its terms was not decided at this stage; the Court indicated that, if a stay is to be granted, the entire awarded amount would need to be deposited, leaving the quantum open for the returnable date.obiter¶27
The Appellant is given liberty to inform the Executing Court about the filing of the Appeal.ratio¶27
The Appellant is granted liberty to seek circulation if execution is filed.ratio

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Bombay High Court (S. M. Modak, J.), interim order dated 13th October 2025 in Interim Application Nos.11184 and 11185 of 2025 in First Appeal (ST) No.8905 of 2025. The Applicants/Appellants (Santosh Karatkar Binavat and Anr.), against whom the Claims Tribunal–Pune had, by Award dated 14th March 2024, directed payment of Rs.15,24,000/- compensation (the Claim against Opponent Nos.3 to 5 having been dismissed), sought interim relief. The Court issued notice to Respondent Nos.1 to 3 / Claimants and on the Stay Application, returnable on 3rd December 2025. The question of stay and the quantum of deposit was expressly left undecided, with an indication that any stay would require deposit of the entire amount. The Appellant was given liberty to inform the Executing Court of the filing of the Appeal and to seek circulation if execution is filed.

Santosh Karatkar Binavat and Anr. v. Sunita Kailas Bhosale and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Santosh Karatkar Binavat and Anr. v. Sunita Kailas Bhosale and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Asha Ashok Chavan and Ors. vs Uday Ramchandra Takale and Anr.

Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. Mumbai vs Ashutosh Rajendraprasad Pandey and Anr.

Divisional Manager,Reliance General Insurance Co.Ltd. vs Shubhash Daulat Shirsath and Anr.

Chandrakant Virupaksha Nandanwade . Vs the State of Maharashtra .

Devanand Eknath Sutar vs State of Maharashtra

Rupa Snehes Bhansali vs Reliance General Insurance Co.Ltd., Navi Mumbai