Jatin Pradeepkumar Sapkale v. State of Maharashtra Thr Tribal Development and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay High Court common order dated 17.02.2025; Coram Ravindra V. Ghuge & Ashwin D. Bhobe, JJ.; Per Court; matters not heard due to paucity of time at 6.00 pm; office objections to be removed within two weeks; ad-interim/interim orders to continue subject to compliance; affidavit in reply/rejoinder to be filed before next date; listing schedule 10.03.2025 to 24.04.2025; categories Urgent Admission, Urgent Order, Due Order, Due Admission, Final Hearing; administrative/scheduling order only; no merits, statutes or precedents dealt with.
What did the court decide?
No substantive relief; administrative listing order passed because the matters could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time: office objections to be removed within two weeks, existing ad-interim/interim orders (if any) to continue subject to compliance, affidavits in reply/rejoinder (if any) to be filed before the next date, and the matters listed on dates from 10.03.2025 to 24.04.2025 across Urgent Admission, Urgent Order, Due Order, Due Admission and Final Hearing categories.