Gurunath Patil v. Rekha Devi Dinesh Singh and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay High Court (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction), SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J., decision date 04/08/2025; consolidated disposal-order covering twenty-four grouped matters: FIRST APPEAL(ST) 21613/2004 (National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Jayashree Vijaykumar Marwadi And Ors.), REJECTED CASE 442/2010 (Oriental Insurance v. Kisan Bhiva Pawar heirs), FA 359/2012 (Bajaj Alliance v. Sunita Rajendra Karande), FA(ST) 18639/2013 (New India Assurance v. Nilesh Satuba Shinde), FA 1515/2014 (New India Assurance v. Jigar Baban Salve), FA 145/2016 (New India Assurance v. Nana Ramchandra Mali), REJECTED CASE 745/2016 (Bajaj Allianz v. Siddheshwar Khelu Bhadakwad), FA 582/2017 (National Insurance v. Prabhavati Popatlal Vaidya), FA 1186/2017 (Manager, New India Insurance v. Ramesh Laxman Dagade), FA(ST) 22211/2018 (Jitesh B. Parmar v. Vijaya Vishwanath Chavan), FA 502/2019 (United India Insurance v. Shyama Raju Malhar), FA 775/2019 (Bharati Axa v. Vandana Santosh Bhandari), FA 1049/2019 (New India Assurance v. Dashrath Shivaji Konde), FA(ST) 95635/2020 (United India Insurance v. Sampada Mahadev Kumbhar), FA 492/2021 (Reliance General v. Siddharth Nivrutti Jagatap), FA(ST) 25788/2023 (United India Insurance v. Kutub Jahan Mohd. Nafis), FA 478/2024 (United India Assurance v. Vilas Pandurang Tamore), FA(ST) 4698/2024 (Swapnil Jandas Mohite v. Amit Anil Potdar), FA(ST) 18149/2024 (National Insurance v. Rupesh Dhanaji Ariwale), FA(ST) 31995/2024 (Regional Controller MSRTC v. Jyoti Dipak Bhojane), FA 293/2025 (New India Assurance v. Arjun Balwant Shikhare), FA 294/2025 (Gurunath Patil v. Rekha Devi Dinesh Singh), FA 679/2025 (Reliance General v. Ayub Firoz Khan), FA(ST) 3683/2025 (MSRTC v. Pandit Baburao Chaure). Key terms: statutory amount/deposit transmission to Tribunal, accrued interest, withdrawal as per Rule, record and proceedings sent back to Tribunal, refund of court fees, pending applications disposed. No counsel present ('None for the Appellant/s. None for the Respondent/s.'); suitable only as procedural/administrative reference, not as a substantive-law citation.