Disposed¶19
Prashant Sudam Jagtap v. Chetan Vitthal Tupe
Bombay HCEP/46/2025
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Bombay HC Commercial Division, E.P. No. 46/2025, Jagtap v. Tupe, coram Arif S. Doctor, J., dated 20-11-2025: service defect in Respondent's Order VII Rule 11 CPC application cured via WhatsApp transmission and undertaking to serve hard copy; Petitioner allowed two weeks for affidavit-in-reply, rejoinder within one week; written statement noted as filed in registry; matter adjourned to 18-12-2025. Procedural order only; no merits decided.
What did the court decide?
Two weeks' time granted to the Petitioner to file affidavit in reply; rejoinder, if any, within one week thereafter; matter stood over to 18th December 2025. ¶19