Disposed¶7

Mr.Surendra Laxman Keni and Ors. v. Mr Janardan Mangalaya Bhandari (Deceased) Thr. Lrs and Ors.

Bombay HC3 Sept 2025CRA/565/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Registrar's dismissal-for-default order; failure to prosecute; steps for fresh notice / postal stamps not taken; Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules 1960, Chapter VII Rule 6(1)(e); unserved Respondent Nos. 1(A), 1(B), 3 & 4; conditional automatic dismissal after grace period; C.R.A. No. 565 of 2024; Interim Application No. 14250 of 2024; High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Civil Appellate Jurisdiction; Registrar (Judl.-II) S.R. Agrawal; order dated 25.03.2025; advocates Mohit Darji, O.R. Tiwari.

What did the court decide?

Final grace period of two (02) weeks to take steps against unserved Respondent Nos. 1(A), 1(B), 3 & 4 without fail; on failure, the Civil Revision Application with Interim Application to stand dismissed against those respondents without further reference to the Court of Registrar. ¶7

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders	Court’s or Judge’s orders
CORAM :S.R. AGRAWAL REGISTRAR (JUDL.-II) DATE : 25^thMarch, 2025
Advocate Mohit Darji i/by O.R. Tiwari for Applicant Present.
The above numbered Civil Revision
Application alongwith Interim Application is listed on board of Registrar for second time. Already two weeks time has been granted,
however, despite granting two weeks time,
Advocate for the Applicant hasnot taken
any steps against unserved Respondent
Nos. 1(A), 1(B), 3 & 4. Here reference to Chapter VII Rule 6 Sub rule 1 and 2 of the Bombay High Court,
Appellate Side Rules, 1960 (for short
“Rules”) may be conveniently made. It
states about Processes, Process fees,
Printing Charges, Security for costs and
other procedure after admission etc.

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
appearance, Court’s orders or directions and
Registrar’s orders

Court’s or Judge’s orders

CORAM :S.R. AGRAWAL
REGISTRAR (JUDL.-II)
DATE : 25^thMarch, 2025

Advocate Mohit Darji i/by O.R. Tiwari for
Applicant Present.

The above numbered Civil Revision

Application alongwith Interim Application is
listed on board of Registrar for second time.
Already two weeks time has been granted,

however, despite granting two weeks time,

Advocate for the Applicant hasnot taken

any steps against unserved Respondent

Nos.
1(A), 1(B), 3 & 4.
Here reference to Chapter VII Rule 6 Sub
rule 1 and 2 of the Bombay High Court,

Appellate Side Rules, 1960 (for short

“Rules”) may be conveniently made. It

states about Processes, Process fees,

Printing Charges, Security for costs and

other procedure after admission etc.

Mr.Surendra Laxman Keni and Ors. v. Mr Janardan Mangalaya Bhandari (Deceased) Thr. Lrs and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr.Surendra Laxman Keni and Ors. v. Mr Janardan Mangalaya Bhandari (Deceased) Thr. Lrs and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Assistant Director, Esi Corporation Sro Thane and Anr. vs M/S a.S.Enterprises Thr. Its Prop. Avtar Singh

Ashok Atmaram Deshmukh vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Gangaram Baburao Mokal and Another vs Maharashtra Housing and Area Developement Authority and Another

Ajay Babanrao Shinde vs Vidya Ajay Shinde

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Thr. Its Tp Hub vs Mr. Sandesh Madhukar Achrekar and Ors.

Vidya Dattatrya Gaikwad vs Dattatraya Tukaram Gaikwad