Disposed¶24

Ashok Thapar v. Supreme IndoSaigaon Associates

Bombay HC14 Oct 2025CPCD/54/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Ashok Thapar v. Supreme IndoSaigaon Associates and ors.; Bombay High Court, Commercial Division; Contempt Petition No. 54 of 2025 in Commercial Suit No. 109 of 2016; Arif S. Doctor, J.; order dated 17/11/2025; draft agreement for sale of unit no. 608 (with identical agreements for units 606 & 607) to be executed in consonance with order dated 20/08/2025; execution without prejudice to Petitioner's rights and contentions; objection to reference to inter se legal proceedings; Defendant's monetary claims against Plaintiffs kept open per paragraph 17 of order dated 20/08/2025; matter stood over to 21/11/2025 for compliance; no statutes or precedents cited.

What did the court decide?

No relief granted or refused; the matter was stood over to 21/11/2025 for compliance. ¶24

Ashok Thapar vs Supreme IndoSaigaon Associates — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

1 9.cpcd-54-2025

¶2

URMILA Digitally signedby URMILA PRAMOD PRAMODINGALE INGALE Date: 2025.11.1911:08:55 +0530

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION

¶4

CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 54 OF 2025

¶5

¶6

COMMERCIAL SUIT NO. 109 OF 2016

¶7

Ashok Thapar ...Petitioner

¶8

Versus

¶9

Supreme IndoSaigaon Associates and ors.

¶10

...Respondents

¶11

Mr. Nirman Sharma a/w Mr. Ansh Karnawat Ms.Mansi Kaku, Mr. Jayesh Mestry, for Petitioner.

¶12

Mr. Hrushi Narvekar a/w Ms. T. Monis i/b ALJ and Partners, for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.

¶13

Mr. Anchit Ojha i/b Mr. Akash Singh, for Respondent No.3.

¶14

CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.

¶15

DATE : 17th NOVEMBER 2025

¶16

P.C.:-

¶17

Mr. Narvekar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent Nos.

¶18

1 and 2 has today tendered a copy of the draft agreement to be executed which according to him is in consonance with the order dated 20/08/2025. Mr. Sharma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submits that while

¶19

his clients are agreeable to execute the agreement that has been shared, the same is not, according to him, in consonance with the order dated 20/08/2025. Since

1/2

Urmila Ingale

2 9.cpcd-54-2025

the same makes reference to certain inter say legal proceedings which he submits that ought not to find mention in the agreement for sale. He thus submits that while his client is ready and willing to execute the said agreement, the same will be without prejudice to his client’s rights and contentions. Mr. Narvekar does not have any difficulty but points out that as per paragraph 17 of the order dated 20/08/2025, the Court had kept open the Defendant’s rights to pursue all other monetary claims against the Plaintiffs. He submits that this also be specifically kept open.

¶24

Stand over to 21/11/2025 for compliance.

¶25

Learned counsel submits that while draft tender shared with the Court today pertains only to unit no. 608. There are 2 other identical agreements which pertain to unit 606 & 607 which shall also be shared and executed in the said terms.

¶26

(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.)

¶27

2/2

¶28

Urmila Ingale

Ashok Thapar v. Supreme IndoSaigaon Associates

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashok Thapar v. Supreme IndoSaigaon Associates

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Ltd. vs Hema Engineering Industries Limited

Seven Star Estates Pvt. Ltd. vs Behram Rustom Ichhaporia and 14 Others

Evervital Lifesciences Private Limited vs Septalyst Lifesciences Private Limited

Bisleri International Private Limited vs Ravi Kanth Kasala Proprietor of Devi Beverages

Zulfikar Akbarali Khoja vs Indian Link Chains Mfrs. Ltd.

Unilever Global Ip Limited and Anr. vs Sri Homes Consumable Private Limited