Chordia Landmarks Realtty Private Limited v. Employees State Insurance Corportion and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay High Court contempt petition disposed; alleged breach of order dated 25-10-2024 permitting business operation and bank account operation subject to 50% deposit; typographical error (stay of de-freezing instead of freezing) caused Indusind Bank to re-freeze account; no contempt by ESIC; unconditional apology by Deputy Bank Manager for himself and Respondent No. 2-Indusind Bank; petition not taken further and disposed of; Coram Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.; decided 17 March 2025; CP 601/2024 in First Appeal Stamp 31510/2014; Petitioner: Chordia Landmarks Realtty Private Limited (Advs. Suresh Sabrad, Gaurav S., Neha Zanje); ESIC (Mr. Sujeet Kurup); Respondent Nos. 2 and 6 (Rohan Savant, Sushmita Gandhi, Anamika Singh, Grishma Dalvi, Kartika Garg i/by Indus Law).
What did the court decide?
None; the Contempt Petition is not taken further and stands disposed of, no contempt being found against ESI Corporation and unconditional apology having been tendered by the Bank in view of the typographical error in the underlying order.