Disposed¶28

Ashok S/O Dattatraya Phanse Since Deceaed v. the Government of Maharashtra through Its Secretary Ministry of Revenue and Forest

Bombay HC4 Feb 2025CP/36/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Legal heirs of Ashok Dattatraya Phanse (through Mrs. Meena Phanse) v. Government of India and Others; Bombay High Court, WP No. 901/2025 with Contempt Petition No. 36/2025; disposed 10.03.2025 by A. S. Chandurkar & M. M. Sathaye, JJ.; petitioner's representation dated 23/07/2024 (liberty from WP 9656/2024) decided on 03/03/2025; liberty reserved to challenge adjudication dated 03/03/2025; all points kept open; counsel: Deepak C. Natu & Gayatri R. Soni for petitioners, AGP S. H. Kankal, Rui Rodrigues & Aniruddha A. Garge for respondents.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner to challenge the adjudication dated 03/03/2025 in accordance with law if aggrieved, with all points kept open; writ petition and contempt petition disposed of. ¶28

Ashok S/O Dattatraya Phanse Since Deceaed vs the Government of Maharashtra through Its Secretary Ministry of Revenue and Forest — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

1 34 WP-901-25 spktomin.doc

¶2

BHARAT DASHARATH PANDIT

¶3

Digitally signed by BHARAT DASHARATH PANDIT Date: 2025.03.13 11:40:42 +0530

¶4

Corrected as per order dated 12/03/2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO. 901 OF 2025

¶6

Mr. Ashok S/o. Dattatraya Phanse (Since deceased) through his Legal Heirs 1.1 Mrs. Meena Wd/o. Ashok Phanse (wife) and Others

¶7

… Petitioners

¶8

V/s

¶9

The Government of India and Others ….Respondents.

¶10

WITH

¶11

CONTEMPT PETITION NO.36 OF 2025

¶12

Mr. Ashok S/o. Dattatraya Phanse (Since … Petitioner deceased) through his Legal Heirs 1.1 Mrs. Meena Wd/o. Ashok Phanse (wife) and Others

¶13

V/s

¶14

The Government of India and Others ….Respondents.

¶15

Mr. Deepak C. Natu a/w Ms. Gayatri R. Soni i/b N. Deepak & Co., Advocates for the petitioner in the above Writ Petition as well as Contempt Petition.

¶16

Mr. S.H. Kankal, Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent nos. 3 and 4 in Writ Petition No.901 of 2025.

¶17

Mr. S.H. Kankal, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent nos. 1 and 2 in Contempt Petition No.36 of 2025.

¶18

Mr. Rui Rodrigues a/w Mr. Aniruddha A. Garge for the respondent nos. 1 and 2 in Writ Petition No.901 of 2025.

¶19

¶20

CORAM : A. S. CHANDURKAR & M. M. SATHAYE, JJ.

¶21

DATE : 10^TH MARCH, 2025

¶22

BDP-SPS

¶23

1/2

¶24

2 34 WP-901-25 spktomin.doc

¶25

P.C. :

¶26

1] By the order dated 05/02/2025, the learned Assistant Government Pleader was granted time to obtain instructions as to when the petitioner’s application dated 23/07/2024 would be decided. This direction was issued in view of liberty granted to the petitioner in Writ Petition No. 9656 of 2024 to make such representation.

¶27

2] Today it is informed that the petitioner’s application has been decided on 03/03/2025.

¶28

3] In view of the aforesaid, since the petitioner’s representation has been decided, it would be open for him to take appropriate steps and challenge the adjudication dated 03/03/2025 in accordance with law, if he is aggrieved with the same. All points in that regard are kept open. The writ petition as well as the contempt petition are accordingly disposed of.

¶29

(M. M. SATHAYE, J.)

¶30

(A. S. CHANDURKAR, J.)

¶31

BDP-SPS

¶32

2/2

Ashok S/O Dattatraya Phanse Since Deceaed v. the Government of Maharashtra through Its Secretary Ministry of Revenue and Forest

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashok S/O Dattatraya Phanse Since Deceaed v. the Government of Maharashtra through Its Secretary Ministry of Revenue and Forest

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Shrinivas Kashinath Lapalikar vs Reserve Bank of India

Welfare Association for the Disabled Thr Its President vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Secretary Revenue and Forest Dept and Ors.

Sanjeevani Shikshan Prasarak Mandal and Anr. vs the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Ors.

Edelweiss Asset Reconsstruction Company Limited vs Savitribai Phule Pune University

Suyash Suryakant Patil vs National Medical Commission Thr. Its Secretary and Ors.

Gic Housing Finance Ltd. Thr. Its Authorised Signatory vs State of Maharashtra Thr. G. P. Adn Ors.