Disposed¶18

Sandip Popat Balip v. Gauravkumar R. Nalinde through Its Secretary the Security Guard Board

Bombay HC25 Mar 2025CONPW/101/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Contempt petition disposed of by Bombay High Court (Ghuge & Bhobe, JJ.) on 28.03.2025 in Sandip Popat Balip v. Security Guard Board (CP 101/2024 in WP 2237/2022); petitioner accepted redeployment near residence, Board assured timely posting options, liberty preserved to pursue service-condition grievances.

What did the court decide?

Contempt Petition disposed of on the basis of the Petitioner's willingness to accept a posting near his residential area and the Board's assurance of timely deployment options; liberty reserved to the Petitioner to seek permissible legal remedies for grievances regarding non-fulfilment of service conditions. ¶18

Sandip Popat Balip vs Gauravkumar R. Nalinde through Its Secretary the Security Guard Board — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Digitally signed by GAURI GAURI AMIT GAEKWAD AMIT Date: GAEKWAD 2025.04.01 10:44:59 +0530

¶2

906.CONPW-101-2024.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶4

CONTEMPT PETITION NO.101 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2237 OF 2022

¶5

Sandip Popat Balip ….Petitioner Versus

¶6

Gauravkumar R. Nalinde through its Secretary The Security Guard Board ….Respondent

¶7

Ms. Nivedita Deshpande for the Petitioner.

¶8

Advocate B.L. Mangale a/w. Mr. Amardev J. Uniyal for the Respondent.

¶9

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ. DATE : 28^th MARCH, 2025

¶10

P.C. :-

¶11

The learned Advocate representing the Petitioner, in the

¶12

light of the order passed by this Court on 25^th March, 2025 and considering the communication dated 24^th March, 2025 marked as ‘X’, submits that since the company, where the Petitioner is being posted as Security Supervisor, is in the Tarapur MIDC area, which is far away, the Petitioner is willing to accept the suggestion of the Board. He would approach the Board and wherever the posting is possible, closer to the residential area of the Petitioner, the Petitioner is willing to abide by such conditions as may be made applicable. If his name is cleared for such deployment, he would report at the

¶13

1 of 2

¶14

Gauri Gaekwad

¶15

906.CONPW-101-2024.odt

¶16

place of deployment. Until such eventuality occurs, he is willing to wait.

¶17

The learned Advocate for the Board submits that the Petitioner would be offered options from which he can choose one and considering the conditions that are applicable, prior to making such deployment and on fulfillment of such conditions, the Petitioner would be deployed on a posting. He assures, on instructions from the Board, that there would not be unnecessary delay in completing this exercise provided the Petitioner cooperates.

¶18

In view of the above, this Contempt Petition is disposed

¶19

off .

¶20

Besides the above issue, if the Petitioner has any

¶21

grievance as regards the non fulfillment of service conditions, considering the earlier engagement, he would be at liberty to avail of a remedy as is permissible in law.

¶22

(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)

¶23

2 of 2

¶24

Gauri Gaekwad

Sandip Popat Balip v. Gauravkumar R. Nalinde through Its Secretary the Security Guard Board

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sandip Popat Balip v. Gauravkumar R. Nalinde through Its Secretary the Security Guard Board

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Sandip Popat Balip vs Gauravkumar R. Nalinde through Its Secretary the Security Guard Board

Lalbabu D. Shah vs Gauravkumar R. Nalinde, through Its Secretary the Security Guard Board

Pandharinath Dilip Kanojia and Ors. vs the State of Maharashtra Thr the Secretary, School Edu. Dept. and Ors.

Shama Parveen Abdul Bashir vs Muncipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai

Shailesh Maruti Naik vs the State of Maharashtra Thr the Secretary and Ors.

Chandrashekhar Shama Shetty vs Shailesh Surendra Singh