Khurshid Bano D/O Sadique Ali v. the State of Maharashtra and 5 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay High Court common order, 17-04-2025, Coram: Ravindra V. Ghuge and Ashwin D. Bhobe, JJ. Purely procedural listing order passed at 6.30 pm rising for paucity of time: office objections to be removed within two weeks; ad-interim/interim orders to continue; reply/rejoinder affidavits to be filed before next date; board chart assigns dates 02-05-2025, 11-06-2025, 26-06-2025 and 27-06-2025 across serial numbers 1 to 249 for urgent order, due order, due admission, fresh admission, final hearing at admission stage, final hearing and disposal. No case numbers, parties, advocates, statutes or precedents appear in the text.
What did the court decide?
No merits decided; the listed matters could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time and were adjourned: office objections to be removed within two weeks, existing ad-interim/interim orders to continue subject to compliance, affidavits in reply/rejoinder, if any, to be filed before the next date, and matters listed per the chart on 2/5/2025, 11/6/2025, 26/6/2025 and 27/6/2025.