Priya Architectural Solutions v. Sanghvi Parrsssva Enterprises LLP
Case brief
What is this about?
Section 9 Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 interim relief granted in terms of prayer clause (c) (disclosure) by consent; appointment of Mr. Rubin Vakil as Sole Arbitrator; conversion of petitions into Section 17 applications; reference covers PAAA (Permanent Alternate Accommodation Agreement), supplemental instruments dated March 16 and 18, 2019, and consent order dated July 23, 2021; transit rent arrears over Rs. 1 crore referred to arbitrator; statutory disclosure under Sections 11(8) and 12(1) within two weeks; arbitral costs borne equally in first instance; no opinion on merits, issues kept open; Contempt Petition No. 3 of 2024 in Arbitration Petition No. 266 of 2021 adjourned to November 17, 2025; Bombay High Court; Somasekhar Sundaresan, J.; decision dated September 23, 2025.
What did the court decide?
Interim relief granted in terms of prayer clause (c) (disclosure) in both Arbitration Petition No. 389 of 2025 and Arbitration Petition No. 390 of 2025; Mr. Rubin Vakil appointed Sole Arbitrator by consent; petitions converted into Section 17 applications before the arbitral tribunal; transit rent arrears (stated to exceed Rs. 1 crore) left for the arbitrator's interlocutory arrangements; Contempt Petition No. 3 of 2024 adjourned to November 17, 2025.