Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. vs Gracewell Pharmaceuticals Private Limited — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. vs Gracewell Pharmaceuticals Private Limited — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Leave Petition (L) No.31975 of 2024 allowed in terms of prayer clause (a); Consent Terms taken on record and marked 'X'; Suit disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms; undertakings in the Consent Terms accepted as undertakings given to the Court; refund of court fees, if any, as per Rules; Interim Application (L) No.32172 of 2024 disposed of as not surviving.

Issue for consideration

Whether the Leave Petition ought to be allowed. +1 more

Court's answer

By consent, and with the Defendant's counsel not opposing, the Leave Petition is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).

Ratio / Principle

Having due regard to the verification of execution of the Consent Terms (supported by the Section Officer's report), the Consent Terms are taken on record and marked 'X'.

Key takeaways

The Suit is disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms.ratio¶¶27
The undertakings contained in the Consent Terms are accepted as undertakings given to the Court.ratio¶¶28
Refund of court fees, if any, is directed as per the Rules.ratio¶¶30

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Consent disposal — Commercial I.P. Suit No.493 of 2025 (Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Gracewell Pharmaceuticals Private Limited), High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Commercial Division (Arif S. Doctor, J.; 16th October, 2025): By consent, and with the Defendant not opposing, the Leave Petition (L) No.31975 of 2024 was allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). The Plaintiff tendered Consent Terms recording settlement of the Suit; their execution was supported by a report of the Section Officer of the Court confirming signature by the authorised signatories of both parties, admission of contents, and execution out of free will without undue influence or coercion. The Court took the Consent Terms on record (marked 'X'), disposed of the Suit in terms of the Consent Terms, accepted the undertakings therein as undertakings given to the Court, directed refund of court fees, if any, as per Rules, and disposed of Interim Application (L) No.32172 of 2024 as not surviving. No statute or precedent was cited; no contested issue was decided.

MANDIRA MILINDSALGAONKAR Digitally signed by MANDIRAMILIND SALGAONKARDate: 2025.10.16 18:48:10+0530

1/2 904 COMIP-493-25.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION

COMMERCIAL I.P.SUIT NO.493 OF 2025

WITH

LEAVE PETITION (L) NO.31975 OF 2024

WITH

INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO.32172 OF 2024

Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. .. Plaintiff Versus Gracewell Pharmaceuticals Private Limited .. Defendant

Mr.Kaivalya Shetye i/b Mr.Mahesh Mhadgut for the Plaintiff. Mr.C.M.Lokesh for the Defendant.

CORAM: ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. DATE : 16th OCTOBER, 2025

P.C:-

At the outset, learned counsel for Plaintiff submits that Leave

Petition be allowed. Learned counsel for the Defendant does not oppose.

By consent, Leave Petition is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).

Learned counsel for Plaintiff has tendered Consent Terms and it is

submitted that the captioned Commercial I.P. Suit has been settled

M.M.Salgaonkar

2/2 904 COMIP-493-25.odt

between the parties. Execution of the Consent Terms is supported by a

report of the Section Officer of this Court, which inter alia, records

thus :-

“The consent term are duly signed by the Authorized signatories of Plaintiff and Defendant. The parties admitted the contents of the Consent Terms. The Consent Term are duly signed by the parties out of their free will without any undue influence and corecion. The Consent term are duly executed by the signatories.”

Having due regard to the fact that the execution of the Consent

terms has been duly verified, the Consent Terms are taken on record and

marked ‘X’.

The Suit is disposed of in terms of Consent Terms.

The undertakings in the Consent Terms are accepted as

undertakings given to the Court.

Refund of court fees, if any, as per Rules.

In view of the disposal of the Suit, Interim Application(s) does not

survive and stands disposed of.

(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.)

M.M.Salgaonkar