Asian Paints Limited v. Rahul Goda
Case brief
What is this about?
Asian Paints Limited v. Rahul Goda / Supercem Industries, Indore; Bombay High Court Commercial Division, COMM. IP SUIT No. 277 of 2024 (cover block prints No. 227 of 2024); trademark infringement and passing off; registered mark ROYALE versus impugned mark ROYAL GOLD; emulsion, distemper, paints; consent terms dated December 2024; defendant acknowledgement of proprietary rights; undertaking and perpetual injunction; decree per prayers (a), (b), (c); contempt clause with Rupees One Crore damages plus other legal remedies; advocates Vinod A. Bhagat (Plaintiff) and Sabah Nasir Khan (Defendant); signatories Yash Patade (constituted attorney; POA chain R. J. Jeyamurugan to Ami Parikh to Yash Patade) and Rahul Goda; annexures: power of attorney and Aadhaar of defendant.
What did the court decide?
Decree in favour of the Plaintiff in terms of prayers (a), (b) and (c) of the Plaint pursuant to consent terms: perpetual injunction restraining the Defendant and those connected with him from manufacturing, packing, marketing, distributing, selling, offering for sale and/or otherwise using the impugned mark ROYAL GOLD and/or any mark identical with and/or deceptively similar to the Plaintiff's registered trade mark ROYALE in relation to emulsion, distemper, paints and such other like goods used in the paint industry; breach attracts contempt liability and payment of Rupees One Crore as damages, in addition to all other legal remedies.