Commissioner Cgst Daman v. Biochem Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
Condonation of 52 days' delay in filing Chamber Order CHOL/32/2024 seeking restoration of Appeal CEXAL/15948/2022, which was rejected on 30.06.2023 under O.S. Rule 986 for non-compliance of office objections; delay attributed to clerk of erstwhile advocate leaving without intimation; respondents served but absent, contentions uncontested; one opportunity granted to remove office objections and register Appeal within four weeks, failing which rejection under O.S. Rule 986; Prothonotary & Senior Master; order dated 16.06.2025.
What did the court decide?
Delay of 52 days in filing the Chamber Order condoned; Chamber Order granted as prayed for restoration of the Appeal, subject to the appellant removing office objections and getting the Appeal registered/numbered within four weeks from the date of uploading of the order, failing which the Appeal would stand rejected under O.S. Rule 986.