Disposed¶24

A Navinchandra Steels Pvt. Ltd. v. the Board of Directors of Abhyudaya Co. Op Bank Limited

Bombay HC4 Dec 2025CARBP/742/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Section 34 Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 limitation extended period 120 days e-filing date additional affidavit commercial arbitration petition Bombay High Court Manish Pitale Navinchandra Steels Abhyudaya Co-op Bank PRS Legal Nedumpara listed 04.12.2025

What did the court decide?

Interim directions only: petitioner to file additional affidavit with averments and documents on e-filing/limitation within a week, advance copy to respondents' counsel; matter listed for further consideration on 04.12.2025. ¶24

A Navinchandra Steels Pvt. Ltd. vs the Board of Directors of… — Arbitration | Bombay HC (2025)

¶1

903&38_CARBP742_25.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶3

COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO.742 OF 2025

¶4

A Navinchandra Steels Pvt. Ltd.

¶5

… Petitioner

¶6

Vs.

¶7

Board of Directors of Abhyudaya Co-op. Bank Limited and others

¶8

… Respondents

¶9

WITH

¶10

INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO.9083 OF 2024

¶11

¶12

ARBITRATION PETITION NO.200 OF 2025

¶13

Mr. Mathews Nedumpara a/w. Ms. Hemali Kurne / Merva and Mr. Mahesh Parab i/b. Nedumpara & Nedumpara Advocate for Petitioner.

¶14

Mr. Madhur Rai a/w. Ms. Sneha Nandgaonkar and Mr. Durgesh Telang i/b. PRS Legal for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.

¶15

CORAM : MANISH PITALE, J. DATE : NOVEMBER 21, 2025

¶16

P.C. :

¶17

. In these petitions, at the outset, learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2 co-operative bank submitted that these petitions cannot be entertained as they have been filed beyond the extended period of 120 days available under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

¶18

A perusal of the contents of the petitions does not show any specific statement as to when the petitions were e-filed so as to demonstrate that they were filed within the period of limitation or at least the extended period of 120 days.

¶19

This is seriously disputed by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, who submits that the documents pertaining to e-filing of the petitions would demonstrate that these petitions were in fact filed within

¶20

1/2

¶21

903&38_CARBP742_25.doc

¶22

the period of 90 days.

¶23

Since the specific averments and documents are not on record, the learned counsel for the petitioner shall place appropriate averments and documents on record by way of an additional affidavit within a week from today, with an advance copy being served on the learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2.

¶24

List for further consideration on 04.12.2025.

¶25

(MANISH PITALE, J.)

¶26

MINALSANDIPPARAB Digitally signed byMINAL SANDIPPARABDate: 2025.11.2116:27:52 +0530

¶27

Minal Parab

¶28

2/2

A Navinchandra Steels Pvt. Ltd. v. the Board of Directors of Abhyudaya Co. Op Bank Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A Navinchandra Steels Pvt. Ltd. v. the Board of Directors of Abhyudaya Co. Op Bank Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Sanjay Gopal Puranik vs Abhay Dattatraya Agge

Gogi Kaur Keer Alias Daljit Tarvinder Keer vs Inderjit Singh Amardeep Chadha Alias Supremo Chadha

Pratap Janardhan Karnath vs Prabodh Janardhan Karnath

Amar Krishna Naik vs Krishna Tukaram Naik (Deceased)

Indus Towers Limited vs Akurli Essbel Chs Ltd.

Indus Towers Limited vs Akurli Essbel Chs Ltd.