B2X Service Solution India Pvt. Ltd. through Its Deemed Resolution Professional S Gopalakrishnan v. Troitech Business Solutions LLP

Bombay HC7 Jan 2025CARBP/459/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Section 29-A Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 mandate-extension petition; Bombay High Court OOCJ; B2X Service Solution India Pvt. Ltd. v. Troitech Business Solutions LLP; Commercial Arbitration Petition No.459 of 2024 with CARP(L) No.30494 of 2024; arbitral mandate expired June 30, 2024; arguments completed, award pending, respondent-side absent; mandate extended six months until July 30, 2025; Somasekhar Sundaresan, J.; decided January 31, 2025.

What did the court decide?

Extension of the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal by six months from January 31, 2025, i.e., until July 30, 2025; Petition finally disposed of in those terms. ¶¶18

B2X Service Solution India Pvt. Ltd. through Its Deemed… — Arbitration | Bombay HC (2025)

¶1

3.CARBP.459.2024&anr.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶3

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶4

COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO.459 OF 2024 WITH COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO.30494 OF 2024

¶5

B2X Service Solution India Pvt. Ltd. ...Petitioner Versus Troitech Business Solutions LLP ...Respondent

¶6

Mr. D.S. Patil, Advocate for Petitioner (through VC).

¶7

CORAM: SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J.

¶8

DATE : JANUARY 31, 2025

¶9

PC :

¶10

This is a Petition under Section 29-A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ( “the Act” ) seeking an extension of mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal, which had expired on June 30, 2024.

¶11

Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that arguments in the proceedings have completed and only the passing of the arbitral award is left. In these circumstances, he prays for extension of mandate of the arbitral tribunal by a period of three months from today. According to him, the counter-party has not been attending the arbitral proceedings.

¶12

Digitally signed by AARTI AARTI GAJANAN GAJANAN PALKAR PALKAR Date: 2025.02.17 18:45:16 +0530

¶13

Page 1 of 2 JANUARY 31, 2025

¶14

Aarti Palkar

¶15

3.CARBP.459.2024&anr.doc

¶16

It is seen from the record that this matter had been listed on January 7, 2025 and January 15, 2025. Since it was undated and it was felt necessary to ascertain the factual status.

¶17

Having heard for an overview of the matter and considering the nature of the proceedings before the arbitrator, I am convinced that it would be appropriate to extend the mandate of the arbitral tribunal by a period of six months from today i.e. until July 30, 2025.

¶18

In these circumstances, this Petition is finally disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

¶19

All actions required to be taken pursuant to this order shall be taken upon receipt of a downloaded copy as available on this Court’s website.

¶20

[ SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J.]

¶21

Page 2 of 2 JANUARY 31, 2025

¶22

Aarti Palkar

B2X Service Solution India Pvt. Ltd. through Its Deemed Resolution Professional S Gopalakrishnan v. Troitech Business Solutions LLP

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

B2X Service Solution India Pvt. Ltd. through Its Deemed Resolution Professional S Gopalakrishnan v. Troitech Business Solutions LLP

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Leadership Boulevard Pvt. Ltd. Vs Saandipini Hi-Tech School and 5 Ors.

Vidyavihar Containers Ltd. vs Gammon Neelkanth Realty Corporation

Nemchand Savla vs Entity Developers Pvt. Ltd.

Babaji Shivram Clearing and Carriers Private Limited vs Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited

Babaji Shivram Clearing and Carriers Private Limited vs Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited

Jayantilal Punshibhai Rita vs Narang and Mahaveer Developers LLP