Mayank J Shah v. Raju v Shah
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay High Court (O.O.C.J.), Commercial Arbitration Petition Nos. 444, 408 and 409 of 2025, Mayank J Shah v. Raju V Shah, order dated 17th July, 2025 (Board Sr. No. 511), Somasekhar Sundaresan J. Nature: adjournment/posting order only - matter stood over to 13/08/2025 with continuation of existing ad-interim/interim reliefs until the next date; reliefs not limited in period remain unaffected. No merits, issues, statutes, precedents or amounts dealt with. Counsel: for Petitioner - Sanjay Jain with Hrushi Narvekar, Parag Kabadi and Anshita Sethi (instructed by DSK Legal); for Respondent No. 1 - Sr. Adv. Chetan Kapadia (VC) with Malcolm Singaporia, Yuvraj Singh (VC), Rajesh Satpalkar, Meherzeen Avasia and Devansh Gadda (instructed by Mulla and Mulla and Craigie Blunt and Caroe). Useful for tracking continuity of interim protection between hearings, not for citation on law.
What did the court decide?
Matter stood over (S.O.) to 13/08/2025; ad-interim/interim reliefs operative as on that day continue until the next date, and reliefs not limited in duration remain unaffected.