Tata Motors Finance Limited v. Rajaram Gurjar
Case brief
What is this about?
Search triggers: Section 9 Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 interim-relief petition by a commercial-vehicle financier (Tata Motors Finance Ltd.) against defaulting borrowers (Rajaram Gurjar and Anr.) whose hypothecated vehicles could not be traced; injunction against sale/alienation/encumbrance of hypothecated vehicles; appointment of Court Receiver to seize financed vehicles; borrower-directed disclosure of vehicle location on oath and peaceful handover with financier acting as Receiver's agent; authorisation to take police assistance (with payment of charges) for physical repossession under an express repossession clause (Clause 12); treatment of absconding/unresponsive respondents served with recall-cum-invocation notices (June 20, 2024 and July 5, 2024) and risk of dissipation rendering arbitration infructuous; interplay of Section 9 ad-interim orders with a forthcoming Section 11 application and Tribunal-stage interim relief; Loan cum Hypothecation cum Guarantee Agreements dated November 30, 2019; claimed dues Rs.2,06,04,711.72; Bombay High Court Commercial Division, Somasekhar Sundaresan J., order dated March 10, 2025, matter stood over to April 7, 2025.