Hafele India Pvt. Ltd. v. Shree RajRajeshwari Enterprises Proprietorship of Meeta Shah
Case brief
What is this about?
Appointment of sole arbitrator by consent under Section 11, Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996; Section 9 petition converted into Section 17 application before Arbitral Tribunal; franchise agreement dispute; interim protection/security for alleged dues left to Tribunal; off-board Section 11 application taken on board by consent; statutory disclosure under Sections 11(8)/12(1); arbitral costs borne equally in first instance; Hafele India Pvt. Ltd. v. Shree Raj Rajeshwari Enterprises (Meeta Shah); Nausher Kohli Sole Arbitrator; Bombay High Court, Original Side, Commercial Arbitration Petition No.458 of 2024; Somasekhar Sundaresan, J.; 15 July 2025; proceedings finally disposed.
What did the court decide?
Appointment of Mr. Nausher Kohli as Sole Arbitrator; conversion of the Section 9 Petition into a Section 17 Application before the Arbitral Tribunal (which is to consider any need for security and interlocutory arrangements); statutory Statement of Disclosure under Sections 11(8)/12(1) to be forwarded within two weeks; parties to bear arbitral costs and fees equally in the first instance, subject to the final Award; Tribunal requested to convene at the earliest, preferably within a week; both captioned proceedings finally disposed of.