Tata Aig General Ins. Co. Ltd., Mumbai v. Parth @ Kanaha S/O Jitendra Khandelwal Thr. Father Jitendra Satyanarayan Khandelwal and Others

Bombay HC19 Sept 2025CAF/2291/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

condonation of delay; 186 days; sufficient cause; insurance company appeal; Tata AIG General Insurance; MACP No.31/2017; District Judge judgment dated 02.08.2024; First Appeal St. No.10992/2025; administrative approval; Nagpur Bench; notice waiver respondent No.1; service on respondent Nos.2 and 3; returnable 08.10.2025.

What did the court decide?

Condonation of delay of 186 days in filing the First Appeal; Registry directed to register the First Appeal; notice for final disposal returnable on 08.10.2025. ¶¶19

Tata Aig General Ins. Co. Ltd., Mumbai Vs Parth @ Kanaha S/O Jitendra Khandelwal Thr. Father Jitendra Satyanarayan Khandelwal and Others — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

10 caf 2291-2025.odt

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR

¶4

CIVIL APPLICATION (CAF) NO.2291/2025 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO.10992/2025

¶5

Tata AIG General Ins. Co. Ltd., Mumbai

¶6

Vs.

¶7

Parth @ Kanaha s/o Jitendra Khandelwal through father Jitendra Satyanarayan Khandelwal and others

¶8

¶9

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders

¶10

Court's or Judge's orders

¶11

- - - - ----- ------------ - Shri H.N. Verma, Advocate for appellant Ms Shreya Bhagat, Advocate for respondent No.1

¶12

CORAM : SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR AND RAJ D. WAKODE, JJ.

¶13

DATED : 19.09.2025

¶14

Heard Shri H.N. Verma, learned Counsel for the applicant through video conferencing and Ms Shreya Bhagat, learned Counsel for respondent No.1.

¶15

The present application is filed by the applicant/appellant praying for condonation of delay of 186 days in filing the present appeal. The applicant is the Insurance Company seeking challenge to the judgment and order dated 02.08.2024 passed by learned District Judge in MACP No.31/2017. The reasons stated in paragraph No.3.

¶16

Learned Counsel for the applicant contends that the reason in filing the present appeal is because of the

¶17

10 caf 2291-2025.odt

¶18

¶19

administrative approval as stated in paragraph No.3 of the application. In view of the aforesaid reasons and the fact that respondent Nos.2 and 3 though served, have not appeared before this Court, we are satisfied that sufficient cause is made out by the applicant for the delay in filing the present appeal. The delay of 186 days in filing the First Appeal is condoned.

¶20

The present Civil Application is disposed of.

¶21

The Registry is directed to register the present First Appeal.

¶22

FIRST APPEAL ST. NO.10992/2025

¶23

Issue notice for final disposal to the respondent, returnable on 08.10.2025.

¶24

Ms Shreya Bhagat, learned Counsel waives notice for respondent No.1.

¶25

The appellant to serve the respondent Nos.2 and 3 by usual mode so also by private mode.

¶26

(RAJ D. WAKODE, J.) (SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR, J.)

¶27

R.S. Sahare

Tata Aig General Ins. Co. Ltd., Mumbai v. Parth @ Kanaha S/O Jitendra Khandelwal Thr. Father Jitendra Satyanarayan Khandelwal and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tata Aig General Ins. Co. Ltd., Mumbai v. Parth @ Kanaha S/O Jitendra Khandelwal Thr. Father Jitendra Satyanarayan Khandelwal and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashlesha D/O Vijay Thakur Vs S.T. Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Amravati Division, Thr. Member Secretary and Ors.

Manohar Tulsiramji Patil and Others vs the State of Maharashtra, Nagpur and Others

Vithal Narayanrao Sange and Others vs the State of Maharashtra, Nagpur and Others

Dr. Swapnil S/O Bhajandas Kamble Vs Sau. Manisha W/O Swapnil Kamble

Mahadeo S/O. Madhav Mankar and Others Vs the Collector, Nagpur and Others

Executive Engineer, Bembla Project Division, Yavatmal Vs Chetan Narayan Mohakar and Others