Irshad Mohd Sharif Shaikh v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay High Court Aurangabad Bench adjournment/DPC order dated 24-09-2025; coram R.G. Avachat J. and Abasaheb D. Shinde J. (per curiam); matters adjourned for paucity of time to 10.11.2025–24.11.2025; covers writ petitions nos. 4522/2012, 5680/2012, 257/2016, 391/2016, 1377/2016, 366/2018, 160/2020, 246/2022, 2689/2022, 3271/2022, 4302/2022, 58/2024, 1767/2024, 2375/2024, 4472/2024, 12923/2024, 13973/2024, 6088/2025 and others with civil applications (e.g., CA 3216/2016, CA 9630/2023, CA 11013/2022, CA 1239/2022, CA 3587/2025); some entries flagged 'Urgent category'; interim relief/undertaking/statement to continue till next date; no ratio decidendi, no statutes, no precedents, no quantum.
What did the court decide?
Administrative adjournment order ('PER COURT') passed due to paucity of time: all enumerated writ petitions and allied civil applications adjourned to the dates mentioned against them (ranging 10.11.2025 to 24.11.2025); any existing interim relief/undertaking/statement in these matters directed to continue till the next date.